Financial

LATEST CYBERSECURITY CHALLENGES IN THE WORLD OF BFSI

Published

3 weeks ago

April 30, 2026

Integrator Web-Admin

Exclusive interview with Premchand Kurup, CEO, Paramount

Which emerging cyber risks are most likely to influence or reshape GCC banking regulations in the coming years?

We live in an era where nearly every banking service depends on advanced digital infrastructure, and cybercriminals are aware of it. With the emergence of AI, the risks have evolved even further, enabling attacks that can adapt and operate at an unprecedented scale. Over the period of 2024–2026, GCC banking regulations in the region are being influenced by the convergence of advanced ransomware, API-driven open banking risks and AI-enabled cyber threats.

Firstly, targeted ransomware and data extortion attacks against banks and fintechs in the Gulf region have evolved from isolated incidents into a persistent and systemic risk. Financial institutions in the UAE and across the GCC region have experienced a noticeable rise in incidents and malware activity through 2024 and into 2025 by nearly 100%, and this is specific to Paramount. . In response, regulators are tightening requirements for incident reporting timelines, operational resilience testing and recovery capabilities within central banks and national cybersecurity frameworks, with these requirements expected to become more stringent in 2026.

Secondly, the rapid expansion of open banking and digital transformation initiatives has made API security and cloud exposure critical regulatory concerns. Misconfigured cloud environments, weak API authentication, and complex third-party integrations are creating new attack surfaces that traditional perimeter-based security models cannot adequately protect. As a result, regulators in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and other GCC countries are strengthening supervisory expectations around identity management, data protection and third-party risk management within banking regulations.

Additionally, the rise of AI-driven fraud and AI-assisted cyberattacks is reshaping how supervisors view the intersection of model risks and cyber risks. AI is being increasingly used to support credit assessment, KYC and fraud detection, while also being leveraged by attackers to scale phishing, social engineering and evasion techniques. This dual-use nature of AI is prompting regulators to develop guidance on AI governance, explainability and enhanced monitoring of AI-enabled processes in the financial sector.

What is one underrated cybersecurity innovation today that you believe will become critical for the Middle East’s BFSI sector over the next few years?

One of the most underrated cybersecurity innovations today, and yet one that is likely to become critical for the Middle East’s banking, financial services and insurance (BFSI) sector over the next few years, is behaviour-based analytics, which has become deeply integrated into security operations centre (SOC) functions and fraud detection systems. Numerous financial institutions still rely heavily on static, rule-based systems that trigger alerts based on fixed thresholds or known attack signatures. While effective against traditional threats, these approaches struggle to detect modern attacks that rely on lateral movement, living off the land (LOTL) techniques and sophisticated social engineering.

In contrast, behaviour-driven analytics establishs dynamic baselines for users, devices, applications and APIs. It continuously monitors the way accounts are accessed, transactions are executed and systems communicate, enabling early detection of anomalies that signal potential fraud or intrusion. These capabilities closely mirror the patterns observed in recent high-impact attacks on banks and fintechs across the region. For GCC banks navigating rapid cloud adoption, open banking frameworks and increasing use of AI in core operations, behavioural analytics is becoming essential. It allows institutions to distinguish legitimate high-volume digital activity from subtle intrusions, as highlighted in the report titled ‘2025 Global Digital Trust Insights – Middle East findings’.

Reflecting this shift, Paramount’s advisory and SOC services in the region are increasingly promoting a transition from purely rule-driven monitoring to a blended model that combines behavioural analytics, traditional rules, and threat intelligence. This integrated approach significantly improves detection speed and reduces false positives in complex Middle Eastern financial environments.

From the Paramount SOC’s perspective, approximately how many security incidents or threats have been monitored and mitigated this year

Over the last year we have issued over 592 critical advisories and mitigated them. Critical advisories are those that have the potential to halt business operations significantly.
The year 2026 has just begun, and we have issued nearly 100 advisories already.

Apart from critical advisories we have issued regular 318 advisories this year while the number stood at 2208 last year . We have just begun the year, but the number of alerts shows an increasing trend.

What types of cyber threats are most frequently detected and addressed by the SOC?

During the fiscal year 2024–2025, the most frequently detected threats identified by Paramount’s SOC include phishing and credential theft leading to account takeover, often using highly localised and AI-generated lures. SOC teams also regularly respond to ransomware and data extortion campaigns, alongside API, web application, and DDoS attacks targeting digital banking platforms. Moreover, cloud misconfigurations and excessive access permissions remain a persistent risk, frequently identified through continuous monitoring and threat hunting.

How can C-suite leaders better prepare their organisations, and what proactive steps should banks take to stay ahead of fraud and cyber threats?

For banks across the GCC region, C-suite leaders need to treat cyber resilience as a core board-level business capability, and not simply as a technical or IT function. With cyber threats having direct implications for financial stability, reputation, and regulatory compliance, leadership should embed cyber risk into enterprise risk management frameworks and board reporting. Major threat scenarios such as prolonged digital channel outages, data extortion incidents, or systemic third-party failures should be quantified and reviewed alongside credit and liquidity risks, in line with evolving GCC regulatory expectations. Leaders should further align their cyber strategies with national cybersecurity frameworks and central bank guidance, using independent maturity assessments to identify gaps and prioritise investments through 2026.

From an operational and technology perspective, adopting a zero-trust approach across identities, devices, networks and applications is becoming essential, particularly in API-enabled and cloud-based banking environments. This should be supported by strong SOC and incident response capabilities, whether in-house or through specialised providers such as Paramount, to ensure 24/7 monitoring, rapid containment and documented playbooks for both regulators and customers. Banks also need to invest in advanced fraud analytics and behaviour-based monitoring to detect account takeover and payment fraud, particularly as AI tools make phishing and social engineering more convincing, as witnessed in recent UAE ransomware trends.

Equally important is rigorous third-party and supply chain risk management. This includes structured security due diligence and continuous monitoring of fintech partners, cloud providers and critical vendors, given the growing risk of indirect compromised paths into Gulf financial institutions. Finally, C-suite leaders should actively promote a strong cyber resilience culture. This involves running realistic simulations of ransomware, data leaks, and payment fraud scenarios to sharpen organisational readiness and showcase proactive resilience to regulators, customers and shareholders.

Given the distinct regulatory, cultural, and operational landscape of the GCC, what makes cybersecurity in the region’s BFSI sector uniquely challenging compared to the US or Europe?

Cybersecurity in the GCC region’s BFSI sector is uniquely challenging because financial institutions operate at the intersection of rapid digital transformation, high geopolitical relevance and complex, multi-layered regulation. From a regulatory standpoint, institutions in the region must comply simultaneously with national cybersecurity authorities, central banks, and in some cases, free zone regulators. These entities impose detailed requirements on controls, data protection and incident reporting, creating a more fragmented and demanding compliance landscape than in many single-jurisdiction markets. The situation is further complicated by strict data residency and data sovereignty rules, which significantly influence how banks can design and deploy cloud, analytics, and cross-border platforms.

Operationally, GCC banks are advancing quickly into digital, mobile and open banking services, often faster than ecosystem-wide security maturity. While this supports financial inclusion, it also expands the attack surface through APIs, cloud services, and fintech partnerships. At the same time, the Gulf region has become one of the most actively targeted regions for financially motivated cybercrime and disruptive attacks, with banks and fintechs featuring prominently in 2024–2025 reports on ransomware, DDoS campaigns and sophisticated fraud schemes. The combination of rapid innovation, partner security, high attacker interest and evolving regulatory expectations creates a risk profile that is distinct from more established markets in North America and Europe.

In response, Paramount’s work with GCC BFSI clients focuses on developing region-specific security architectures and systems rather than simply importing models from other geographies. This includes designing frameworks aligned with local regulatory obligations, regional threat intelligence and the operational realities of Middle Eastern institutions as they evolve through 2026.

Financial

QASHIO AND NEXA AI LAB LAUNCH PARTNERSHIP TO AUTOMATE FINANCE WORKFLOWS IN THE UAE

Published

4 hours ago

May 22, 2026

Integrator Web-Admin

Qashio, the UAE’s leading spend management platform, has partnered with NEXA AI Lab, the AI division of NEXA, one of MENA’s leading digital growth agencies, to help accelerate AI adoption across finance teams in the UAE through automation and AI-powered financial workflows.

As part of the partnership, Qashio and NEXA AI Lab will work together to support businesses in adopting AI tools that improve spend visibility, streamline manual processes, and make finance operations more efficient. The partnership will also include a free AI audit to help finance teams identify where AI can deliver immediate operational value and support broader adoption across the business. Both companies say the initiative is designed to move businesses from AI awareness to implementation, in line with the UAE’s national AI strategy targeting full public sector AI integration by 2031.

Amit Vyas, CEO of NEXA, comments: “AI delivers value when it is embedded directly into day-to-day workflows, rather than treated as a standalone concept. Finance is one of the clearest areas where this shift is already taking place, with businesses under increasing pressure to improve real-time decision-making. Through our partnership with Qashio, our goal is to help organisations identify where AI can be applied in practical, high-impact ways across financial operations.”

Armin Moradi, CEO of Qashio, said: “A global industry survey shows that 81% of financial institutions expect AI to be embedded in their core operations by 2030, and the UAE is one of the fastest-growing AI markets globally, setting a new baseline for competitiveness across the private sector. Our partnership with NEXA AI Lab is built to help close the gap between AI adoption plans and real execution, enabling enterprises and SMEs in the UAE to compete with the best in the world.”

Qashio has already integrated AI into its own financial workflows through features such as AI-powered receipt capture, which automatically extracts key information, including TRN, vendor names, and transaction data. The technology helps finance teams reduce manual data entry, save more than 4 hours each week, and maintain cleaner, more reliable financial records.

NEXA brings deep expertise in digital transformation and AI implementation across industries. Together, the two companies are focused on making AI accessible and measurable for businesses in the UAE. Both companies are already using tools like ConvoAI to improve access to data and provide instant support outside of working hours. Qashio is already leveraging NEXA AI Lab’s product offering. This reflects a broader shift towards always-on, AI-enabled operations.

Financial

Standard Chartered Supports Pakistan’s First Panda Bond Issuance in Chinese Interbank Market

Published

4 days ago

May 18, 2026

Integrator Web-Editor

Pakistan has successfully completed its inaugural Panda bond issuance in China’s interbank bond market, raising RMB 1.75 billion through a three-year transaction that marks the country’s first direct entry into China’s capital markets.

Standard Chartered (China) Ltd. Co acted as the only foreign bank serving as joint lead underwriter and joint book runner for the transaction, supporting Pakistan in broadening its international financing channels while strengthening financial connectivity between regional capital markets.

The issuance received strong support from multilateral development institutions, including the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which together guaranteed 95 per cent of the bond’s principal and interest payments. The structure helped attract significant demand from Chinese banks, securities houses, and international financial institutions.

The transaction was reportedly more than five times oversubscribed, allowing Pakistan to price the bond at 2.50 per cent, the tightest end of the indicated pricing range.

Salman Ansari, Global Head, Capital Markets, Standard Chartered, described the issuance as a strategically important transaction that expands Pakistan’s access to global liquidity pools while demonstrating the growing relevance of regional capital markets within the international funding landscape.

The transaction also reflects the broader evolution of the Renminbi within global financial markets, as China continues expanding the role of its currency beyond trade settlement into cross-border financing and sovereign funding structures.

Jerry Zhang, Global Head of Banks & Broker Dealers and Head of Coverage, Greater China and North Asia at Standard Chartered, said the transaction highlighted the bank’s role in connecting international issuers with China’s domestic capital markets while also reflecting the continued internationalisation of the Renminbi.

The Panda bond market has increasingly attracted a wider range of sovereign, supranational, and institutional issuers in recent years as regional economies explore diversified funding channels and deeper access to Chinese liquidity pools.

Financial

WHY GLOBALLY CONNECTED FAMILIES MUST PLAN FOR GEOPOLITICAL CHANGE

Published

2 weeks ago

May 8, 2026

Integrator Web-Admin

By Nazneen Abbas, Founder, Ma’an

Families with wealth across borders are already used to complexity. They live with different legal systems, different inheritance regimes, and different tax realities, often all at once. That part is not new. What has changed is the speed at which the environment around those structures is moving. The geopolitical backdrop is no longer something families can treat as distant noise. It is beginning to alter the conditions in which wealth is held, transferred, and protected.

That is becoming visible in the questions families are now asking. Across the GCC, many who already have Wills, trusts, foundations, and succession structures in place are no longer asking whether they have planned. They are asking whether what they put in place still holds. The conversation is shifting away from documents and toward durability, resilience, and relevance over time.

The issue is not complexity, it is movement

Cross-border planning has always required care. What feels different now is the sense that the regulatory environment may be entering a period of faster movement. Tax agreements that were once taken as given could come under review. Reporting standards may tighten further. Frameworks in some jurisdictions may no longer offer the same level of certainty that families have relied on.

That does not automatically make an existing plan ineffective. It does mean the assumptions on which it was built may no longer be fully reliable. A structure that made sense five or seven years ago may still be valid on paper, but it may now interact differently with another jurisdiction’s rules. That difference is where risk begins to accumulate.

Many families are not dealing with poor planning. They are dealing with planning built for a slower-moving environment. A framework can be professionally drafted and entirely appropriate for its time, yet still require review because the conditions around it have changed. The gap, in many cases, is one of timing rather than quality.

Families do not experience risk as corporations do

Public discussion around geopolitical risk is usually framed in corporate language – market access, supply chains, revenue exposure. But geopolitical literacy is no longer just a corporate issue.

The same forces that alter corporate decision-making also alter the legal and tax environment in which private wealth sits. The difference is that families encounter those forces at far more personal moments. A business responds through compliance and restructuring. A family may discover, during a bereavement or a generational transition, that a structure meant to preserve stability is now sitting between conflicting legal systems or newly expanded obligations. The cost of outdated planning is rarely just technical. It is emotional, and it often surfaces when a family is least equipped to navigate it.

What a meaningful review actually covers

Families and family offices in the GCC with assets or obligations across multiple jurisdictions need to review their planning as a connected system. The question is not whether the Will is signed or the foundation properly established. It is whether those elements continue to work together under current conditions.

Do existing Wills still align with the succession laws of each jurisdiction involved? Do trust or foundation structures still operate as intended alongside local inheritance frameworks, reporting obligations, and tax treatment? The review also needs to reach instruments often created with care and then left untouched. Private Placement Life Insurance (PPLI), for example, may still be appropriate, but its treatment can vary depending on where the family is resident, where beneficiaries sit, and how international agreements evolve. Dynasty Trusts and Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs), especially when governed by US law, deserve renewed scrutiny where family circumstances or legal interpretation have materially changed.

This is not about alarm. It is about alignment. Cross-border structures fail less often because a single instrument is flawed, and more often because the instruments stop speaking to one another.

The plan may hold. Does it still fit?

A plan can remain legally intact and still fall behind. Families change. Children grow up. New dependents enter the picture. Businesses expand into new jurisdictions. Property is acquired in places never part of the original conversation.

If a structure no longer reflects the family’s wishes, responsibilities, or values, it is no longer doing its full job. The real test is not whether it remains untouched, but whether it continues to reflect the life it is meant to support. That matters especially in this region, where families operate across borders almost by default.

The strongest plans are not always the most elaborate. They are the ones revisited honestly and adjusted before pressure forces the issue. Families often treat estate planning as something to complete and put away, which is understandable.

Cross-border wealth planning across jurisdictions cannot remain static. It requires ongoing stewardship. Families that pause to review their structures now are doing what good planning has always required: ensuring the framework continues to reflect not just the world it operates in, but the family it is there to serve.