Connect with us

VAR

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Clash Of The Folding Phenoms

Published

on

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 pro Fold

Foldables belong to a niche category of the flagship smartphone segment. These cutting-edge, dual-screened gadgets are reserved for the ones willing to spend considerably more than what a regular (still expensive) flagship like the iPhone 15 Pro Max or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra costs. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are two of the latest and greatest entrants into this elite arena. They are the most advanced embodiments of the foldable smartphone tech, flaunting thinner bodies, larger screens, and sturdier, more efficient hinges. So then, which of these state-of-the-art, futuristic pieces of consumer tech is the best? Moreover, which one would suit your needs the best? Find out in this in-depth Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold comparison. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — The Trailblazer Of Foldable Smartphones 

Ever since its inception, the Samsung Fold series has played a pivotal role in popularizing foldable smartphones. The Galaxy Z Fold6 is the latest heir of this innovative bloodline. The Fold6 sports a squared-off design compared to the more rounded-off aesthetics of its immediate predecessor. Upgrades underneath its skin are incremental and there isn’t much to be super-excited about, except for the new AI features. However, Samsung has strengthened the dual rail hinge of the Fold6 with a more rigid folding edge, which they claim is better at distributing the shock of external impacts. While we see that smartphone hardware is generally evolving at a slower pace, it is actually satisfying to know that Samsung putting in significant effort to make their foldables more durable. While the Fold6 shares all other technological aspects with regular smartphones, including performance and cameras, enhancing and upgrading the foldable components, seems like the right move. On top of that, the more squarish design doesn’t just deliver sleeker aesthetics but also provides a better in-hand feel, thus enhancing the user experience. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 on a table

Keeping the tech aspects apart, from a user perspective, the Fold6 is the most polished iteration of the Fold series, not simply because it’s the latest but because of the re-proportioning of the design. The cover screen is now slightly wider, and less like a TV remote, and the weight has come down by around 14 grams compared to the Fold5. Another groundbreaking upgrade is on the ingress protection front. While the previous Fold models were limited to only water resistance, the Fold6 offers IP48 dust and water resistance. In simple words, the 4 in the rating ensures that no particles larger than 1 mm can enter the device. As it happens every year, the chipset has been upgraded to the latest in the market. Powering the Fold6 is the best of Android chipsets, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Other than these significant upgrades, the Fold6 mostly matches its predecessor’s hardware components including camera hardware, battery size, and charging speeds. 

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Vanilla Foldable Experience

Software experience is the paramount strong point of any Pixel phone. However, that isn’t only how the first Pixel Fold amazed us. Google’s first foldable was a well-proportionate device in terms of screen real estate. However, these user advantages were overshadowed by some of the disadvantages of the design itself. The Pixel Fold was too bulky to deliver the goodness of the proportionate screen during prolonged usage. On top of that, the original Pixel Fold didn’t open or fold flat, which further took away from the user experience, when compared to the more refined competitor of the time — the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5. However, for a first-generation foldable, it can undeniably be said that the Pixel Fold was a superlative product. 

Recently, Google introduced the successor to the original Fold, along with the Pixel 9 series. Now called the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, a name that aligns better with the current flagship lineup, the new folding smartphone is seemingly leaps and bounds ahead of its predecessor. For starters, the new phone is taller and slimmer, while the fluid-friction hinge has been upgraded for increased durability and delivering a satisfying snap when the phone is opened. Both the displays are now larger, delivering a more immersive user experience. The cover screen has grown from a 5.8-inch unit with a peak brightness of 1,550 nits in the previous FOld to a 6.3-inch unit with a peak brightness of 2,700 nits. The larger inner screen of the Pixel Fold measured 7.6 inches diagonally (1,450 nits peak brightness) which is now upgraded to a massive 8-inch unit (2,700 nits peak) in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. 

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has also gained a superior ultra-wide lens which now features a larger sensor, offering 127 degrees of truly “ultra-wide” coverage. Furthermore, both the front cameras (cover screen and inner screen) have been upgraded to the same 10 mp shooter. On the battery front, it is surprisingly a downgrade from the 4,821 mAh unit of the original Pixel Fold to a 4,650 mAh cell in the 9 Pro Fold. However, as Google is a smartphone company focused primarily on software experience and optimization, we’ll have to test the phone out extensively to determine whether the downsizing has inversely affected the battery life or ended up boosting it. These are the groundbreaking upgrades Google has bestowed upon the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, resulting in an all-encompassing redesign of their foldable. For a second-generation foldable, the Pixel 9 Pro is now up to the mark and capable of competing with the mighty Samsung. However, there is one major drawback, which we will address in the comparison. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: So Then, Which Foldable Triumphs Over The Other?

It’s time for the battle now and firstly, let’s discuss similarities and keep them apart. Both the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Pixel 9 Pro Fold run Android 14 out of the box and are promised seven major updates. Both feature crisp and bright OLED displays inside out, although of different sizes and specs. Also, both the phones are equipped with three rear cameras each and a total of two front cameras, one on the cover screen and one inside. Now for the differences, I’ll lay them out sector by sector. 

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Is The More Powerful One

Processing power is one of the central factors when it comes to the performance of any smart device or computer, including smartphones. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is powered by the latest and greatest processor from Qualcomm — the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold on the other hand is invigorated by Google’s in-house Tensor G4 chipset. While both of these powerhouses are built on the 4 nm architecture, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is far superior to the Tensor G4 in terms of sheer processing power and gaming performance. 

Three Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 phones on a table

According to tests conducted by NanoReview, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performs 76% better in floating-point computation and shows up to 55% higher AnTuTu 10 benchmark scores. The 8 Gen 3 also supports 20% higher memory bandwidth (77 against 64 GB/s) and runs on a 6% higher CPU clock speed (3300 Vs 3100 MHz). On paper, the only pro in favor of the Google Tensor G4 over the Snapdragon is its higher GPU frequency (~22%). However, when tested out by NanoReview, the GeekBench compute score of the Adreno 750 GPU in the 8 Gen 3 completely obliterates the Mali-G715 of the Tensor G4. The Adreno 750 scored 14,269, which is around 148% higher than the 5,758 score of the Mali-G715. 

This means that regardless of whether it is single-core, multicore, or GPU performance, the 8 Gen 3 is miles ahead of the Tensor G4. We hope the Tensor series to evolve into a more capable and potent chipset as its next iteration, the Tensor G5, is reportedly being built on TSMC’s 3 nm process. But as of now, it is no match to the mighty, Snap-py, Dragon. 

The Pixel 9 Pro Fold Takes The Cake For The Software Experience

Google offers arguably the best Android user experience because the OS itself is made by Google in the first place. Hence, the vanilla Android experience provided by Google phones remains unmatched and unaffected by competitors. It is just so pleasantly designed, with the right amount of simplicity and vibrancy. There is absolutely zero bloatware, and it is exceptional to use in both screens of the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. And then there are the clever features Google has reserved for their own phones. These features such as Live Caption, Pixel Studio, Pixel Screenshots Circle To Search, and Now Playing, all contribute to delivering a superior user experience. 

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Although the latest Galaxy devices including the Fold6 come integrated with AI features, Google is simply better in terms of overall software experience. On top of all that, the latest range of Pixel phones, also offer a bunch of cool new Camera software trickery. The most prominent one is the “Add Me” feature which allows the photographer to be in the photo by combining two consecutive images together. The results of this AI feature are too good to be true, and it is just one example of the Pixel’s impressive software prowess. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Other Significant Hardware Differences

Apart from the processor, there are some other major hardware changes differentiating these foldables from each other. They are as follows – 

Size, Convenience, And Protection: The Lighter One vs The Thinner One

The Samsung Galaxy Flip6 weighs in at 239 g whereas the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is heavier at 257 g. To put that into perspective, the iPhone 15 Pro Max weighs 221 grams, and the S24 Ultra 232 grams. So in comparison, the Flip6 is only marginally heavier, while the Pixel is considerably more hefty, which might affect day-to-day usability. On top of that, the Flip6 offers IP48 dust and water resistance, while the Pixel is limited to IPX4 water resistance. However, the Pixel is thinner and wider, both when folded and unfolded. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a thickness of only 10.5 mm when folded, against the 12.1 mm thickness of the Fold6. 

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Screens: The Pixel Offers More

The cover screens of both these phones measure 6.3 inches, with negligible differences in resolution and pixel density. However, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a wider aspect ratio and looks more regular against the longer structure of the Flip6. Similarly, the inner screen of the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is larger, measuring 8 inches diagonally, against the 7.6 inches provided in the Flip6. Both the inner and outer screens of the Pixel also boast a 100 nits higher peak brightness rating of 2700 nits. 

Storage: Faster, Larger Storage Options vs Extra RAM

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers up to 1 TB of fast UFS 4.0 storage, while the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is capped at 512 GB, that too, slower UFS 3.1. Conversely, the 9 Pro Fold offers up to 16 gigs of RAM, whereas the Flip6 is limited to 12.  

Camera: 8K Video Recording vs Better Front Cameras 

On the optics front, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, as mentioned earlier, offers a wider ultra-wide lens — 127-degree coverage against 123 in the Fold6. The Fold6 retaliates by offering 8K video recording when the Pixel is limited to 4K. When it comes to front cameras, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold dominates by offering the same 10 MP camera with autofocus on both its screens. The Samsung, while incorporating a 10 MP camera onto the inner screen, is limited to a 4MP sensor in the cover screen, both of them without autofocus functionality.  

Battery: Larger Battery vs Faster Charging 

Keeping the Galaxy Fold6 alive is a 4,400 mAh battery pack that supports wired fast charging of up to 25 watts and wireless up to 15 watts. It further offers reverse wireless charging functionality, rated up to 4.5 watts. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold features a larger 4,650 mAh battery pack. However, its wired fast charging wattage hasn’t been revealed by  Google yet, but we know that the wireless charging speed is rated at a mere 7.5 watts. Google just mentions “hours of power in minutes of charge with Google 45W USB-C Charger”, although multiple sources mention that the wired charging speed is capped at 21 watts.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Crowning the Foldable Champion

We have analyzed the specs and features of these two foldables in-depth and we conclude that we would prefer both of these devices; just for different usage styles. It might seem like the usual diplomatic answer, but hear me out. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a more performance-oriented device, offering phenomenal processing power compared to the Pixel. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, on the other hand, dominates on the software front with its clever tricks that are not just gimmicks but legitimately usable in daily life. Hence, you will have to make a choice based on your needs, preferences, and aesthetic taste. To help make your decision easier, here’s a simplified list of differentiating factors that set these two impressive foldable phones apart. 

Samsung Galaxy Fold 6Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold  
Lighter Thinner And Wider 
Stronger ProcessorVanilla Android Experience
Dust Resistance / Ingress ProtectionLarger, higher resolution screens with slightly higher brightness
Up to 1 TB Of UFS 4.0 StorageUp to 16 GB RAM
Faster Charging SpeedsLarger Battery
8K Video Recording Higher-resolution front cameras

Spotlight

HONOR Pad X9b Max Review: When a Tablet Starts Challenging Your Laptop

Published

on


With a huge 13-inch display, a 10,100mAh battery and familiar Android productivity tools, HONOR’s Pad X9b Max makes a convincing case for going big, although its size brings compromises of its own.

BY Srijith KN, Senior Editor, Integrator Media

The HONOR Pad X9b Max makes its intentions clear almost immediately. With a 13-inch display, this is not a tablet designed primarily around compactness. It wants to give you enough screen to watch, browse, multitask and, increasingly, get some proper work done.

That became the most interesting part of my time with it.

Rather than approaching the Pad X9b Max purely as an entertainment device, I connected a Bluetooth keyboard and began using it for documents, browsing, ChatGPT and some of the everyday tasks I would normally reach for my laptop to handle.

The result is a tablet that gets surprisingly close to feeling like a lightweight workstation in the right circumstances, although whether you would actually leave the laptop behind is a slightly more complicated question.

A 13-inch display that makes a difference

The headline feature is undoubtedly that 13-inch LCD display.

At 2500 × 1560 resolution and with a refresh rate of up to 120Hz, there is plenty of space here for websites, documents and video. But the more important point is simply how much larger everything feels when you start working on it.

I happened to have a Huawei MatePad 11.5 alongside the HONOR during testing, and putting the two next to each other made the difference immediately apparent. The Huawei feels much more like a conventional portable tablet. The Pad X9b Max begins moving into laptop territory.

Documents have more room to breathe, websites feel less constrained and working with text is particularly pleasant. I noticed this while using ChatGPT, where longer conversations almost began to resemble working inside a document rather than interacting with a mobile application.

The 120Hz refresh rate also helps keep scrolling and general navigation fluid, while the large canvas makes multitasking considerably more attractive than it is on smaller tablets.

There is, however, an obvious trade-off.

A 13-inch tablet isn’t something I would choose specifically because I wanted the smallest device possible in my bag. The size that makes the X9b Max so appealing on a desk is also what makes smaller tablets easier to carry and use casually.

That’s the fundamental compromise here: I prefer the HONOR when I’m sitting down to work; I prefer the idea of a smaller tablet when I have to carry it.

Productivity becomes part of the proposition

Pair the Pad X9b Max with a keyboard and the large display begins making considerably more sense.

I used a Kensington Bluetooth keyboard during testing, and the combination worked well for writing, browsing and moving between applications. Microsoft Word introduced its own subscription-related complications, but that’s more a reflection of Microsoft’s software model than a limitation of HONOR’s hardware.

The wider Android ecosystem is also important. With MagicOS and access to familiar Google applications, getting my usual collection of services onto the tablet was straightforward.

My review unit comes with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, so this isn’t hardware I would position as a replacement for a high-performance notebook. But for everyday productivity — web applications, writing, email, research, media and lighter multitasking — the experience makes a convincing argument for using the tablet instead of reaching for a laptop every time.

Expandable storage also gives the X9b Max additional flexibility for users carrying large collections of documents or media.

Built for entertainment too

Of course, productivity is only half the appeal of having this much screen.

The Pad X9b Max’s size makes video one of its natural strengths. HONOR has paired the display with a quad-speaker system, DTS:X Ultra and IMAX Enhanced support, reinforcing the tablet’s entertainment credentials.

And this is where having 13 inches requires considerably less justification. Video simply benefits from the additional scale, whether you’re watching from a desk, sofa or bed.

It also means the Pad X9b Max can comfortably switch roles during the day: a document and browser screen while working, followed by a sizeable personal entertainment display once the keyboard goes away.

A battery built for the bigger canvas

Powering all of this is a 10,100mAh battery, paired with support for up to 45W HONOR SuperCharge.

The large capacity makes sense considering the size and resolution of the display. More importantly, battery life is critical for a tablet being positioned as both an entertainment device and a productivity companion. Having to constantly look for a charger would undermine much of the convenience of leaving a laptop behind.

We wouldn’t reproduce HONOR’s laboratory endurance claims as our own results here; for the VAR piece, the more relevant point is that HONOR has equipped its largest screen with an appropriately substantial battery.

Verdict

The HONOR Pad X9b Max succeeds because its 13-inch display isn’t merely a specification designed to look impressive on the box. It materially changes what the tablet is good at.

There is substantially more room for documents, browsing, multitasking and content, and adding a keyboard transforms it into a surprisingly useful desk-based productivity device.

But its greatest strength also creates its biggest compromise. At this size, the X9b Max isn’t as effortless to carry around as a smaller tablet, and once you add a keyboard, you inevitably start comparing the entire setup with taking a laptop instead.

That makes the Pad X9b Max particularly appealing for someone who wants one large-screen device capable of moving between work and entertainment, rather than someone whose priority is maximum portability.

It hasn’t made my Dell redundant.

But it has made me reach for it less often, and for a tablet this size, that’s probably the more meaningful achievement.

Continue Reading

Spotlight

OPPO Reno16 5G Review: A Polished Upgrade, But Does It Do Enough?

Published

on


The Reno series has become an important part of OPPO’s smartphone portfolio, sitting between the increasingly competitive mid-range segment and the company’s more premium offerings. With the Reno16 5G, OPPO isn’t attempting to completely reinvent that formula. Instead, it has focused on improving the overall package across design, photography, battery life, software and AI.

Having previously used the Reno14 as one of my primary phones, I was particularly interested in whether the Reno16 felt like a meaningful progression or simply another annual refresh.

After spending time with the device, there is plenty here that feels better refined, although its AED 2,499 UAE price also raises some questions about performance and overall value.

BY SRIJITH KN, SENIOR EDITOR, VAR


A more polished Reno!
My review unit arrived in Twilight Violet, and the Reno16 makes a strong first impression. The aluminium frame, slim symmetrical bezels and overall finish give the device a noticeably premium character.

The 6.32-inch display is also excellent for everyday use. Content looks sharp, the interface feels fluid and the screen is more than capable for browsing, video, social media and photography. The buttons feel solid too, while the haptic feedback deserves particular mention. It is one of those smaller details that contributes considerably to how polished a phone feels in everyday use.

Overall, OPPO has done a good job of making the Reno16 look and feel like a device worthy of its position in the Reno portfolio.

The camera remains a Reno strength

Camera performance was one area where I expected the Reno16 to prove itself, and it largely did.

Images generally came out with natural-looking colours and balanced exposure, without leaving me waiting for noticeable processing after pressing the shutter. There can still be a slightly punchy character to some photographs, but nothing that particularly bothered me.

During testing, I photographed a building opposite me where part of the upper floor had previously suffered fire damage. Zooming into the scene, I was impressed by how closely the camera reproduced the smoke-stained and burnt areas compared with what I could see with my own eyes.

The front camera also performed well. Selfies retained good detail and produced results that I was quite happy to share without much additional editing.

That perhaps sums up the Reno16 camera experience best. It is designed for someone who wants to take the phone out, capture the moment and quickly have an attractive, shareable image.

Performance is good, but the price changes expectations

The Reno16 5G is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, and for everyday smartphone use, I have few complaints.

Messaging, email, browsing, photography, social media, content consumption and moving between applications all feel responsive. I didn’t encounter anything during normal use that made the Reno16 feel particularly slow.

But this is also where the AED 2,499 price becomes important.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is a capable processor, but buyers spending this amount can reasonably expect considerable performance headroom. Users interested primarily in everyday smartphone tasks are unlikely to have an issue, but demanding gamers and those running heavier workloads may find more powerful alternatives at this price.

The Reno16 therefore gets everyday performance right. I simply would have liked OPPO to push the performance envelope further.

Battery and charging strengthen the package

One specification that certainly stands out is the 6,700mAh battery, particularly when combined with 80W SUPERVOOC charging.

Battery capacity has become an increasingly important battleground among smartphone manufacturers, and OPPO has managed to package a substantial battery without making the Reno16 feel unnecessarily cumbersome.

Fast charging also remains one of those features whose usefulness becomes obvious very quickly. Rather than leaving a phone connected for extended periods, being able to add significant charge during a relatively short stop is genuinely practical.

AI is here, but practicality matters more!

Unsurprisingly for a smartphone arriving in 2026, AI plays a significant role in OPPO’s software proposition.

The Reno16 includes the AI Snap Key, which can provide quick access to features such as AI Mind Space. But what I appreciate more is that OPPO allows the physical key to be customised for other functions.

I configured mine to switch between Ring, Vibrate and Silent, and found myself appreciating that simple functionality more than another dedicated AI shortcut.

That flexibility is important. AI capabilities will continue evolving rapidly, but consumers still interact with their smartphones through dozens of simple actions every day. Sometimes improving those actions creates more immediate value than adding another headline AI feature.

ColorOS is fast, although I still want more customisation

ColorOS runs smoothly on the Reno16, and there is no noticeable lag during ordinary use. As mentioned earlier, the haptics are particularly good.

I am less convinced by some of the interface aesthetics. The pre-installed applications and certain default visual elements aren’t necessarily to my taste, and I would like greater freedom around icon customisation and the Quick Settings interface.

These are largely subjective complaints, however. For someone primarily using the Reno16 for messaging, email, photography, browsing, social media and entertainment, ColorOS gets the fundamentals right.

The AED 2,499 question?

The Reno16 5G is ultimately a polished smartphone with very few obvious weaknesses. The camera is dependable, the construction feels premium, the battery capacity is impressive, 80W charging is genuinely useful and everyday performance is smooth.

What prevents it from becoming an automatic recommendation is not something the Reno16 does particularly badly. It is simply how competitive the market becomes once a smartphone reaches AED 2,499.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is perfectly capable, but at this price I would have liked more performance headroom.

For Reno14 users, however, the improvements across design, camera, battery and the overall experience make the Reno16 feel like a meaningful progression. If you already own a Reno15, the argument for upgrading immediately is considerably harder to make.

The Reno16 gets most of the fundamentals right. The question buyers ultimately need to answer is whether that polished overall experience is enough to justify its price.

Srijith kn
Continue Reading

VAR

Baseus PicoGo AC22 Review: How Much Power Can Fit in Your Pocket?

Published

on


Carrying a power bank often means accepting a compromise between capacity and convenience. A 10,000mAh unit typically demands a dedicated bag compartment, while ultra-compact chargers rarely hold enough power to be genuinely useful on a long day. The Baseus PicoGo AC22 takes a more elegant approach, placing a high-density 10,000mAh battery into a footprint roughly the size of a wireless earbuds case.

Reviewed By Srijith KN, Senior Editor, Integrator

The result is a portable charger that feels purpose-built for the daily commute. Rather than requiring a backpack, it slips easily into a pocket. When you factor in the built-in USB-C cable that doubles as a carrying strap, the AC22 becomes a surprisingly practical solution for professionals moving between meetings, flights, and remote workspaces.

A Different Approach to High-Density Power

The first thing that stands out about the PicoGo AC22 is its size-to-output ratio. Baseus utilises a dual-cell silicon-carbon battery chemistry, which allows the unit to remain exceptionally compact while delivering a 45W maximum output. On paper, 45W is a technical specification. In practice, it becomes the charger’s defining advantage. It provides enough current to fast-charge flagship smartphones from zero to fifty percent in under thirty minutes, and can even sustain smaller USB-C laptops during a layover.

The integrated eight-inch USB-C cable makes the concept even more practical. A secondary USB-C port allows for simultaneous dual-device charging, though output drops to a combined 5V/3A when both are in use. A smart digital display clearly indicates the remaining battery percentage, removing the guesswork often associated with four-LED indicator systems.

Design That Feels Ready for Travel

The AC22 is constructed with travel in mind. Weighing just 170 grams, it carries full TSA compliance for airline carry-on. The built-in cable is robust enough to act as a lanyard, though its short length means you cannot easily use your phone while the charger sits in your pocket.

This combination feels particularly relevant for airport lounges, cafes, and conference centres. The unit does generate noticeable warmth during sustained 45W output, but a comprehensive seven-point safety system manages thermal limits effectively. It recharges fully in roughly two hours via a 30W input, ensuring it is ready for the next leg of the journey.

For users who require magnetic attachment or wireless charging, Baseus offers the sibling AM52 model. However, for those prioritising rapid wired charging in the smallest possible format, the PicoGo AC22 delivers reliable, predictable power without the usual bulk.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 | The Integrator