Connect with us

Tech Features

ICT CHAMPION AWARDS 2026: FIELD NOTES — FROM HYPE TO HABIT 

Published

on

Award winners and industry leaders stand on stage at Integrator Media – the ICT Champion Awards 2026 in Dubai, holding trophies beneath the ICT Champion Awards backdrop.

By Subrato Basu, Global Managing Partner, The Executive Board with Srijith KN Senior Editor, Integrator Media. 

On 28 January 2026, Integrator Media hosted the 18th edition of the ICT Champion Awards at the Shangri–La Dubai Hotel, bringing together the region’s ICT ecosystem for an evening designed to celebrate milestones, recognise innovation, acknowledge ecosystem leaders, and foster community.  

The programme—aligned with INTERSEC 2026—spotlighted organisations making measurable impact across enterprise solutions, critical infrastructure, cybersecurity, and public-sector technology.  

By 7pm, the Shangri-La Dubai’s Al Nojoom Ballroom had the feel of a ‘state of the union’ for regional ICT—CXOs, partners, and platform leaders in one room, with AI dominating every board agenda. This wasn’t just an awards evening; it was a moment to take stock: are we still experimenting with AI, or are we ready to operationalise it at scale? 

Across conversations at tables and in the corridors, the same theme surfaced: experimentation is easy—operational confidence is the hard part. 

Opening keynote: “Is AI ready for us in the UAE—and what next?” 

The evening’s tone was set by Mr. Maged Fahmy, Vice President, Ellucian MEA, who opened with a deliberately provocative question: Is AI ready for us in the UAE? What made the question stick wasn’t the technology—it was the implication that leadership models are now the constraint. 

His message wasn’t framed as a technology debate—it was framed as a leadership test. 

As a leader in enterprise technology for education and public-sector institutions—where trust, governance, and outcomes are non-negotiable—Fahmy’s ‘hype to habit’ message landed with particular weight. 

His argument was simple: the UAE is past AI curiosity. The next phase is habit—repeatable, governed AI embedded in day-to-day work. The real question is no longer ‘Can we do a PoC?’ but ‘Can we run this reliably, measure it, and scale it?’ 

We’re moving from Generative AI (creating content) to Agentic AI (executing work). That shift changes leadership: fewer people doing repeatable steps, more orchestration of workflows across systems—with humans focused on judgement, risk, and exceptions. 

For example, an agent can triage a service request, propose the fix, route it for approval, execute the change, and only escalate the ‘weird 3%’ to a human owner. 

Leadership reality check: are we still leading like it’s 2022? 

He also offered a leadership reality check: if your operating rhythm still assumes long cycles, manual coordination, and slow approvals, you’ll struggle in 2026. Strategy can’t be an annual exercise; it must become a live set of decisions, guardrails, and feedback loops. 

AI gives the “how”; humans must own the “why” 

His framing landed: AI increasingly gives you the how—options, sequencing, automation. But leaders must own the why—purpose, priorities, ethics, and accountability. In an agentic era, that ‘why’ is what keeps speed from becoming risk. 

He also anchored AI’s value in a more human currency: time. Yes, AI drives efficiency. But the real prize is what leaders do with the time they get back: better customer interactions, faster decision-making, more innovation, and more space for creative work that machines cannot replicate. 

Talent gaps, transformation, and “sovereign AI” 

The keynote did not gloss over constraints. Fahmy flagged the talent gap that emerges when adoption rises faster than capability—especially in AI engineering, cybersecurity, governance, and change leadership. His call was practical: the future workforce isn’t only “AI builders,” but AI challengers—people who can validate outputs, pressure-test recommendations, and govern autonomous workflows. 

He also introduced the importance of sovereign AI in the GCC context—where nations like the UAE and Saudi Arabia are thinking deeply about data residency, cultural alignment, regulatory control, and strategic autonomy. The point wasn’t simply “host it locally,” but to build AI that is trustworthy in local context: aligned to language, norms, governance expectations, and national priorities. 

In practical terms, sovereign AI means keeping sensitive data and model control within national boundaries, enforcing local governance and auditability, and ensuring outputs reflect language, culture, and regulatory expectations. 

Strategy ownership, authority, and misinformation 

In 2026, he argued, leaders must be explicit about who owns strategy when decisions are increasingly shaped by AI systems. If an agent can recommend, negotiate, or trigger actions at speed, the organisation needs clarity on authority: approval thresholds, auditability, escalation paths, and responsibility when something goes wrong. 

He also linked AI strategy directly to misinformation risk—not as a social media issue alone, but as an enterprise challenge: hallucinations, deepfakes, synthetic fraud, manipulated signals, and decision contamination. The answer, he implied, is not fear—it’s governed adoption: controls, verification, identity assurance, and clear human accountability. 

He closed with a grounded reminder that landed strongly with the awards theme: the winners in 2026 won’t be defined by the “fastest AI,” but by the clearest purpose—and by the culture they’ve built to sustain transformation. 

Panel discussion: “Seamless Intelligence” — when AI becomes invisible (and unavoidable) 

The panel discussion, moderated by Srijith KN (Senior Editor, Integrator Media), brought the theme down from keynote altitude into product and platform reality. The session, titled “Seamless Intelligence: How AI and Dataare Powering the Next Generation of Intelligent Experiences,” featured: 

  • Mr. Rishi Kishor Gupta, Regional Director (Middle East & Africa), Nothing Technology 
  • Ms. Bushra Nasr, Global Cybersecurity Marketing Manager, Lenovo 
  • Mr. Nikhil Nair, Head of Sales (Middle East, Turkey & Africa), HTC 
  • Ms. Aarti Ajay, Regional Lead Partnerships (Ecosystem Strategy & Growth), Intel Corp 

One way to read the panel: infrastructure decides what’s possible, security decides what’s safe, and experience decides what gets adopted. 

The discussion converged on one powerful idea: in the next phase, the user shouldn’t “see” the intelligence—it should dissolve into the experience. The ambition is not “AI features,” but AI-native interactions that feel natural, predictive, and frictionless across devices and contexts. 

Infrastructure: where does intelligence actually run? 

From the infrastructure angle, the panel stressed that “AI everywhere” requires deliberate choices about where compute happens—on device, at the edge, or in the cloud—and how workloads move across that spectrum. This included clear emphasis on the hardware stack (CPU/GPU/NPU) and what it takes to scale AI responsibly. 

“AI won’t scale on slogans; it scales on architecture—device, edge, and cloud—each with different cost, latency, and security trade-offs.” 

Trust: security, fear factor, and the “moving data center” 

From the trust perspective, the panel highlighted the growing “fear factor” around devices and autonomy: more sensors, more data, more models—more attack surface. A memorable analogy landed well: the modern connected vehicle increasingly behaves like a moving data center, raising the bar on governance, identity, and resilience. 

“Every new AI capability is also a new attack surface—security has to be designed in, not bolted on.” 

Human experience: AI as an experience, not a tool 

On the human side, the conversation explored how AI will increasingly show up as experience—wearables, ambient assistance, multi-sensory support, and interactions that augment how people see, decide, and act. The subtext was clear: if AI is going to become ubiquitous, it must become intuitive—and aligned to what humans actually value. 

“AI is becoming an experience, not an app—supporting how we see, decide, and act, often without the user noticing the machinery behind it.” 

Consumer reality: “make human life smarter” and “declutter your life” 

From the consumer device lens, the message was refreshingly plain: AI should help make human life smarter—not noisier. That includes automation that reduces cognitive load and helps people “declutter” their day-to-day, rather than introducing another layer of complexity. 

The moderator wrapped the session with a sober economic note: as the stack expands from devices to cloud subscriptions and services, the cost of modern digital life rises—making it even more important that AI delivers tangible value, not just novelty. 

“If AI doesn’t declutter your life, it’s not helping.” 

Executive Board Commentary: The real shift is “delegation”—not adoption 

If there was one undercurrent in the room, it’s that we’ve moved past the question of whether AI is “interesting.” The real question now is: what can we delegate—safely, repeatedly, and at scale—without degrading trust? That’s why the keynote’s emphasis on moving beyond PoCs into governed, repeatable operating models felt so relevant.  

This is the step-change many organisations underestimate: adoption is a technology story; delegation is an operating model story. In an agentic era—where systems don’t just generate answers but initiate actions—the enterprise doesn’t need more demos. It needs a way to decide: what tasks can be automated end-to-end, what must stay human-led, and what requires a hybrid “human-in-the-loop” pattern?  

A useful lens: the “Delegation Curve” 

Think of your AI journey as a curve with three stages: 

  1. Assist (copilot) – AI helps humans do the work faster (drafting, summarising, analysing). 
  2. Act (agentic) – AI executes steps across workflows (triage → route → approve → action), escalating exceptions.  
  3. Assure (governed autonomy) – AI operates with clear authority limits, auditability, and continuous controls (especially critical in regulated sectors and national infrastructure contexts).  

Most enterprises are still celebrating Stage 1, experimenting in Stage 2, and under-investing in Stage 3. Yet Stage 3 is where operational confidence is built—and where reputational risk is avoided. 

The missing KPI: “Trust latency” 

The panel made it clear that infrastructure, security, and experience all shape whether “seamless intelligence” is adopted in the real world.  

But the deeper measurement leaders should add is trust latencyhow long it takes an organisation to trust an AI outcome enough to act on it without manual re-checking

In practical terms, the most important AI metrics in 2026 won’t be model accuracy in isolation. They’ll look like: 

  • Time-to-trust (how quickly decisions can be taken without repeated human verification) 
  • Exception rate (the “weird 3%” humans must handle)  
  • Containment rate (how often an agent resolves end-to-end without escalation) 
  • Governance velocity (how quickly policy, approvals, and controls keep up with agent speed) 

This is where leadership becomes the constraint—or the advantage. 

Sovereign AI isn’t just residency; it’s “accountability at the boundary” 

The keynote’s introduction of sovereign AI resonates strongly in the GCC because the stakes aren’t only technical. They are cultural, regulatory, and strategic.  

The next phase of sovereign AI will be defined not by where data sits, but by where accountability sits—who can inspect, audit, override, and certify AI behaviour, especially when agents trigger actions across systems. 

Sovereign AI done well will become a competitive advantage: it makes cross-sector adoption easier because it offers confidence by design—clear boundaries, policy alignment, and traceability. 

The “AI dividend” test: what are you doing with the time you saved? 

A subtle but powerful keynote point was that AI’s real asset is time.  

The leadership question is what you do with it. In organisations that win, the reclaimed time becomes: better customer experience, sharper decision-making, faster innovation cycles—and more human attention where it matters. 

In organisations that struggle, that time gets lost to rework, re-checking, and governance friction—because trust was never engineered into the operating model. 

The new perspective to carry forward 

At ICT Champion Awards, the celebration of winners implicitly reinforced the real benchmark for 2026: repeatability. Not “who has the flashiest AI,” but who can run it reliably with trust, governance, and measurable outcomes.  

So perhaps the most useful question to take forward is this: 

What are the first 3 workflows in your organisation that you are willing to delegate to agentic AI—end-to-end—under clearly defined authority, auditability, and exception handling? 

That’s also what the ICT Champion Awards ultimately celebrated: not technology theatre, but execution maturity. The winners weren’t simply early adopters—they were organisations demonstrating innovation with outcomes, leadership with accountability, and scale with governance. In a year defined by agentic possibilities, the Awards served as a reminder that the real competitive edge is operational confidence—systems that work, controls that hold, and teams that can sustain change. Hype is easy; habit is earned. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech Features

The Middle East’s Digital Boom Is Creating A New Visibility Challenge

Published

on

By Gaurav Mohan, SVP Sales – APAC, India, Middle East & Africa, NETSCOUT

The Middle East is building one of the world’s most advanced digital economies. Across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the wider Gulf, artificial intelligence is moving from experimentation into production. Sovereign cloud strategies are reshaping infrastructure. 5G is powering smart cities,, autonomous services and new digital business models. Yet as organisations accelerate innovation, many are struggling to maintain visibility across these digital infrastructures that gives them the knowledge they need to manage, control and protect their business.

Today’s digital services rarely operate within a single environment. Applications, workloads and services are spread across sovereign clouds, hyperscalers, regional data centres, telecommunications networks and edge environments, each generating its own telemetry, tools and operational workflows. As a result, organisations often gain more data but less understanding of how their services actually behave end to end.

According to Enterprise Management Associates’ Network Management Megatrends 2026 report, 51 percent of enterprises now manage four or more distinct network domains, 38 percent of organisations lack end-to-end visibility across their network domains and even 24 percent acknowledge having areas where their monitoring tools cannot see at all. This highlights a growing paradox that organisations are rich in data but poor in visibility.

That means decisions are made using incomplete information. Incident response slows down, operational risk increases, and it becomes even harder to protect the customer experience. In the Gulf, the challenge is particularly relevant. As data is increasingly localised to meet regulatory obligations, applications and workloads naturally cluster around where that data resides. While this strengthens governance and compliance, it can also fragment visibility if organisations lack a consistent view across multiple environments.

Often the most valuable operational and security information never travels between users and applications. It moves silently between cloud workloads, databases, APIs and servvices inside the infrastructure itself. If organisations cannot observe and understand these interactions, they miss the activity that often matters most.

The conversation is no longer simply about visibility. It is about whether organisations can trust the data used to make operational and AI-driven decisions. The question that must be answered is do they have the trusted operational data that is the authoriative network evidence that gives them the certainty they need to make better, smarter decisions – faster.

High-fidelity network data provides a more accurate and consistent view of network activity, helping teams fill the gaps left by logs, metrics and sampled telemetry. It enables organisations to move beyond assumptions and approximations, allowing teams to understand events as they occur and investigate them with confidence.

The most authoritative source of network intelligence comes directly from network packets, providing  an independent record of how applications, infrastructure and users actually interact. Rather than relying solely on sampled metrics or instrumented logs, it gives teams evidence grounded in observed network activity. The result is a clearer understanding of both operational and security events.

In the Middle East, where regulatory expectations continue to evolve and data sovereignty remains a priority, that level of accuracy carries particular importance. Organisations are increasingly expected to demonstrate resilience, accountability and operational transparency. Meeting those expectations becomes significantly harder when visibility is incomplete.

AI does not eliminate operational uncertaity. In fact, it magnifies and can force-multiply whatever uncertainty already exists. Feed AI incomplete or inconsistent data and it simply automates bad decisions faster. Feed it complete, contextual and trusted network intelligence, and AI becomes more accurate, responsive and reliable.

The Middle East has invested heavily in building world-class digital infrastructure. As AI, sovereign cloud and connected services continue to expand, organisations tha combine comprehensive visibility with trusted, high-fidelity network intelligence will be able to thrive. In the next phase of digital transformation, success will be defined not simply by how much infrastructure organizations build, but by how clearly they can see, understand and act across it with confidence.

Continue Reading

Tech Features

WHY EXCEPTIONS, NOT INVOICES, ARE COSTING FINANCE TEAMS THE MOST

Published

on

By Ionut Valentin Sas, SVP Finance, UiPath

Across the GCC, processing standard invoices has become relatively straightforward. Routine invoices are no longer the problem. The real bottleneck begins the moment an invoice falls outside the expected workflow, whether that is a mismatched PO, a missing approval, incorrect coding or a supplier query. From there, the process spills into email threads and spreadsheets, and finance teams pay for it in delayed cash flow, missed early payment discounts, strained supplier relationships and tied-up working capital. The invoice itself was never really the problem. The problem is what happens when it does not follow the usual pattern.

The Trouble with Exceptions

Straight-through processing, where an invoice moves from receipt to payment without human intervention, has been one of finance teams’ most effective ways to handle higher invoice volumes at lower cost. Companies like Canon have reported up to 90 percent STP for certain invoice types.

Yet according to Ardent Partners’ State of ePayables report, even top-performing AP teams only reach around a third. That gap reflects a shift already under way in accounts payable. As routine invoices increasingly process themselves, less time goes into verifying standard transactions, and more of the team’s effort shifts toward judgment, coordination and resolving what falls outside the pattern, such as invoices missing a PO, mismatched purchase orders, supplier follow-ups and approval bottlenecks.

Most automation was built for the predictable majority of transactions. The remaining cases still get routed back to people, with no system designed to resolve them faster or more consistently. Resolving an exception often means pulling information together from ERP systems, procurement platforms, contracts, past transactions and supplier communications before a decision can be made. The challenge is rarely a lack of information. It’s that the information sits across multiple systems and requires someone to piece it together before a decision can be made. That’s where most of the time is lost.

Invoicing in the UAE

The UAE’s move toward mandatory e-invoicing is one of the clearest signals of this shift. For many organisations, this transition will expose processes that have remained largely hidden while invoices were handled manually. Standardised, machine-readable invoices make routine processing easier, but they also shine a light on the exceptions that continue to require human intervention. As a result, organisations have an opportunity to redesign how those exceptions are managed, rather than simply digitising existing processes. The mandate requires structured, machine-readable invoices in place of the PDFs and spreadsheets many finance teams still rely on, and it is pushing organisations to take a hard look at how they handle exceptions today.

Compliance is only the starting point. The bigger opportunity is using this transition to modernise broader finance operations and rethink how exceptions get managed, not just to meet the regulatory deadline.

The Importance of Governance

As more of this resolution work shifts to AI agents, visibility, auditability and control become essential. Governance is not there to slow decisions down. It is what gives organisations the confidence to automate lower risk work while keeping higher risk decisions transparent, explainable and subject to human oversight. Done well, orchestration keeps people in charge of decisions, not just faster at processing them. That becomes increasingly important as finance teams automate larger parts of the invoice lifecycle. Confidence in AI comes not from removing people altogether, but from knowing when human judgement should remain part of the process.

The UAE’s e-invoicing mandate makes this need for governance harder to ignore. But governance should not be seen as a brake on AI adoption. It is what makes that adoption trustworthy.

The Shift Finance Leaders Must Make

The old mindset was to automate invoices. The new one is to resolve exceptions.

That is the shift finance leaders now need to make, treating exception management as the next frontier in finance automation rather than an afterthought bolted onto invoice processing. The foundation for that shift is orchestration, bringing people, systems and AI agents together around each exception instead of simply flagging it for someone to pick up later.

AI agents can do much of the groundwork before a person is even involved, gathering supporting information, analysing how similar cases were resolved in the past, recommending next steps and drafting supplier communications. That does not replace judgment. It means the judgment that does happen is faster and better informed. The organisations that gain the greatest advantage will not necessarily be those processing the highest number of invoices automatically. They will be those that can resolve exceptions quickly, consistently and with the right level of oversight, turning what has traditionally been a source of delay into a competitive advantage. The GCC built its reputation in digital government and public services by fixing what was not working, not by polishing what already was. Finance now has the same opportunity in front of it. The invoices were never the hard part. The exceptions are, and the organisations that get ahead of them will be the ones setting the pace for the next phase of digital invoicing in the region.

Continue Reading

Tech Features

THE BEAUTIFUL GAME, FOR EVERYONE: HOW TECHNOLOGY REWROTE THE RULES OF FOOTBALL FANDOM

Published

on

By: Jason Ou, President at Hisense MEA

As the FIFA World Cup 2026 final approaches this week, we reflect on a tournament that transformed how millions experienced the sport, from living room stadiums to quiet spaces in packed arenas

As we count down the final hours before this week’s showpiece final, the FIFA World Cup 2026 has delivered 103 matches across 16 cities, and with it, a reimagining of what “experiencing football” means.  Hisense served as the official and exclusive Video Assistant Referee (VAR) Review TV Provider for the entire tournament across the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Every controversial offside call. Every penalty review that had fans screaming at their screens. Every red card confirmation that shifted the momentum of a knockout match. The technology referees used to make those match-defining decisions ran on Hisense RGB MiniLED displays. The Video Operation Room in Zurich was upgraded specifically with these screens because VAR officials needed “clear and authentic restoration of live match footage.”

And it delivered.

Two parallel revolutions unfolded across this tournament: one that transformed homes into legitimate viewing destinations, and another that finally opened stadium doors to millions who’d been locked out for decades.

Hisense made an argument before kickoff: the home viewing experience could, in some ways, surpass what you’d get at the stadium itself. If the technology was precise enough for officiating decisions scrutinized by billions and debated across social media within seconds, it was good enough for living rooms worldwide.

For those who invested in the L9Q TriChroma Laser TV, everyday living spaces became premium match-day destinations throughout the tournament. With ultra-large displays up to 200 inches, fans followed every run, pass, tackle, and goal with remarkable clarity.

The flagship UXS RGB MiniLED TV, powered by breakthrough RGB MiniLED technology that delivers exceptional color accuracy, brightness, and contrast, brought fans closer to every moment on the pitch and created a more immersive and lifelike viewing experience for sports, entertainment, and gaming.

The Party Everyone Could Finally Join

For millions of fans living with autism, PTSD, dementia, anxiety, and other sensory processing conditions, the stadium experience had remained firmly out of reach, a party they could hear from outside but never truly join. This tournament changed that.

At this year’s tournament, all 16 host stadiums featured dedicated sensory rooms, making this the first-ever Sensory Inclusive FIFA World Cup. Hisense collaborated with FIFA and KultureCity to install these spaces across every venue in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and they were used.

As Hisense continues pushing boundaries, making every match feel bigger, every celebration more immersive, and every memory more unforgettable, one truth has emerged from this tournament: the hierarchy of World Cup viewing has been expanded, making room for everyone who loves the beautiful game.

This week, as billions watch the final from living rooms with 300-inch screens and fans with sensory needs take their seats in the stadium, football’s promise will be fulfilled. The beautiful game. Finally, for everyone.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 | The Integrator