Connect with us

Tech Features

THE YEAR AI WENT MAINSTREAM

Published

on

Person wearing a blue suit jacket, black shirt, and light purple tie standing against a plain grey background at Heriot-Watt University Dubai.

Talal Shaikh, Associate Professor, Heriot-Watt University Dubai

In 2025, artificial intelligence crossed a threshold that had little to do with model size or benchmark scores. This was the year AI stopped feeling like a product and started behaving like infrastructure. It became embedded across work, education, government, media, and daily decision-making. The shift was subtle but decisive. AI moved from something people tried to something they assumed would be there.

From my position at Heriot-Watt University Dubai, what stood out most was not a single breakthrough, but a convergence. Multiple model ecosystems matured at the same time. Autonomy increased. Regulation caught up. Infrastructure scaled. And nations began to treat intelligence itself as a strategic asset.

From one AI story to many

For several years, public attention clustered around a small number of Western firms, most visibly OpenAI and Google. In 2025, that narrative fractured.

Google’s Gemini models became deeply embedded across search, productivity tools, Android, and enterprise workflows. Their strength lay not only in conversation, but in tight coupling with documents, spreadsheets, email, and live information. AI here was designed to live inside existing habits.

At the same time, Grok, developed by xAI, took a different path. With real-time access to public discourse and a deliberately opinionated tone, it reflected a broader shift in design philosophy. AI systems were no longer neutral interfaces. They carried values, styles, and assumptions shaped by their creators. That diversity itself was a sign of maturity.

By the end of 2025, users were no longer asking which model was best. They were choosing systems based on fit, trust, integration, and intent.

The rise of agentic AI

If generative AI defined earlier years, agentic AI defined 2025.

In 2023, most people experienced AI as a chatbot. You asked a question, it replied, and the interaction ended. In 2025, that interaction became continuous. An agent does not simply respond. It reads context, sets sub-goals, uses tools, checks results, and decides what to do next.

A chatbot drafts an email. An agent reads the full thread, looks up past conversations, drafts a response, schedules a meeting, and follows up if no reply arrives. A chatbot explains an error. An agent runs tests, fixes the issue, commits code, and opens a pull request.

This transition from response to agency turned AI from a helpful assistant into an operational participant. It also shifted risk. As systems gained the ability to act, questions of oversight, auditability, and failure containment moved from academic debate into everyday management.

A shift I saw first in the classroom

This change was not abstract for me. I saw it unfold directly in my classrooms.

Only a short time ago, many students dismissed AI-assisted coding with a familiar phrase: “It hallucinates.” They were not wrong. Early tools often produced code that looked correct but failed logically. Students learned quickly that blind trust led to wasted hours.

In 2025, that language faded.

Students now approach AI differently. They no longer ask whether the model is correct. They ask why it produced a solution, where it might fail, and how to constrain it. In one recent lab, a student debugging a robotics control pipeline did not reject the AI output after a failed test. He used it to generate alternative hypotheses, compared execution traces, and isolated the fault faster than traditional trial and error would allow.

At one point, a student stopped and said, “It is not hallucinating anymore. It is reasoning, but only if I reason with it.”

That sentence captures 2025 better than any benchmark.

From skepticism to supervision, in industry

The same shift is visible among our alumni now working in software engineering, fintech, data science, and robotics. Several who once warned juniors not to trust AI code now describe it as a first-pass collaborator. They use it to scaffold architectures, surface edge cases, and speed up documentation, while keeping final judgment firmly human.

The concern is no longer hallucination. It is over-reliance.

AI moved from being treated as an unreliable shortcut to being treated as a junior colleague, fast, useful, and fallible, requiring supervision rather than dismissal.

Sovereign AI, two models of power

One of the clearest signals that AI went mainstream in 2025 was the divergence in how regions approached it.

In much of the West, the year was framed as a corporate contest. Product launches, market share, and valuation battles dominated headlines. Innovation moved fast, driven by competition between private firms.

In the Middle East, and particularly in the UAE, the framing was different. AI was treated as national infrastructure.

The UAE’s investment in sovereign models such as Falcon and Jais reflected a belief that intelligence, like water or electricity, must be secured, governed, and trusted within borders. This was not about isolation. It was about resilience, data sovereignty, and long-term capacity. Dependence without control came to be seen as a strategic risk.

In 2025, this idea matured. Sovereign AI stopped being a slogan and became a planning principle. While the West debated which company would win, the UAE focused on ensuring that the capability itself remained accessible, accountable, and locally anchored.

When culture embraced AI

Another signal of mainstream adoption arrived from outside the technology sector.

The strategic alignment between The Walt Disney Company and OpenAI marked a moment when AI entered the core of global culture. Disney does not adopt technologies lightly. Its value lies in storytelling, world-building, and intellectual property sustained over decades.

This move was not about automating creativity. It was about scale and continuity. Modern story worlds span films, series, games, theme parks, and personalised digital experiences. Managing that complexity increasingly requires intelligent systems that can assist across writing, design, localisation, and audience interaction.

When a company whose primary asset is imagination treats AI as foundational, it signals that intelligent systems are no longer peripheral to creative industries. They are becoming part of how stories are built, maintained, and experienced. In that sense, 2025 marked the moment AI became cultural infrastructure, not just technical tooling.

Work changed quietly

Another sign of mainstreaming was how little drama accompanied adoption. Professionals stopped announcing that they were using AI. They simply expected it.

Developers assumed code assistance and automated testing. Analysts assumed rapid summaries and scenario modeling. Marketers assumed content generation and performance analysis. Students assumed access, but outcomes increasingly depended on how well they could guide, verify, and critique what AI produced.

This created a new divide. Not between technical and non-technical people, but between those who could reason with AI and those who delegated thinking to it.

What this means for universities

For universities, 2025 closed the door on treating AI as optional.

Every discipline now intersects with intelligent systems. Engineers must understand ethics and regulation. Business graduates must understand automation and decision support. Creative fields must grapple with authorship and originality. Researchers must design methods that remain valid when AI is part of the workflow.

At Heriot-Watt University Dubai, this pushes us toward assessment that rewards reasoning over polish, and education that teaches students not just to use AI, but to supervise it.

The real shift

AI went mainstream in 2025, not because it became smarter, but because society reorganised around it. Multiple models coexisted. Agents acted with growing autonomy. Nations planned for sovereignty. Culture adapted. Classrooms recalibrated trust.

The next phase will not be defined by faster models alone. It will be defined by judgment.

That is the quieter, more demanding challenge left to us after the year AI went mainstream.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech Features

HOW WOMEN SCIENTISTS CAN ACCELERATE NATIONAL INNOVATION GOALS

Published

on

Dr Heba El-Shimy, Assistant Professor (Data and AI), Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Dubai

Healthy societies, institutions, or teams operate best when comprising a healthy balance between males and females. A landmark study by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) with the Technical University of Munich uncovered that companies with above-average gender diversity generated around 45% of their revenues from innovative products, compared to only 26% as innovative revenues for companies with below-average gender diversity. These findings are echoed in the scientific field. A 2025 study by Nature analyzing 3.7 million US patents revealed that inventing teams with higher participation of women are associated with increased novelty in patents. Research by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology confirms that teams with more women exhibit significantly higher collective intelligence and are more effective at solving difficult problems. These studies tell one clear story: that participation of women in innovative and scientific fields is not only desirable — it is a strategic national asset.

UAE Women In STEM

The UAE holds one of the world’s most striking gender profiles in STEM education. According to UNESCO data, 61% of graduates in STEM fields are Emirati women, surpassing the Arab world average of 57% and nearly doubling the global average of 35%. At government universities, 56% of graduates are women, and they represent over 80% of graduates in natural sciences, mathematics, and statistics.

These numbers have translated into accomplishments that have captured global attention. The Emirates Mars Mission — the Hope Probe — was developed by a team of scientists that was 80% women, selected based on merit. Noora Al Matrooshi became the first Arab woman to complete NASA astronaut training in 2024. The Chair of the UAE Space Agency and the mission’s Deputy Project Manager is a woman: H.E. Sarah Al Amiri. At Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI), female enrolment reached 28% within five years and continues to grow. Women’s talents are being recognised — this is not a mere future ambition, but a present reality.

Scientific Research As An Engine For National Strategy

The ‘We the UAE 2031’ vision sets ambitious goals: doubling GDP to AED 3 trillion, generating AED 800 billion in non-oil exports, and positioning the country as a global hub for innovation, artificial intelligence, and entrepreneurship. The UAE’s rise to the 30th place in WIPO Global Innovation Index 2025 signals a steady pace towards achieving the UAE 2031 vision. Sustaining this ascent requires continued investment into human capital to produce research output, intellectual property, and commercial innovation at a pace matching the ambition. This is precisely where women scientists become indispensable.

Women scientists are already major contributors to the seven priority sectors identified in the UAE National Innovation Strategy: renewable energy, transport, education, health, technology, water, and space. UAE women scientists are research-active in climate science, sustainable materials, clean energy systems, AI-driven diagnostics in healthcare, and environmental monitoring — all crucial sciences that the national development commitments depend on.

Knowledge economies are built on the ability to generate, apply, and commercialize research locally — reducing the dependence on imported technologies and creating self-sustaining innovation ecosystems. When a researcher at UAEU develops patented computational methods for drug design, as Dr. Alya Arabi recently did with four patents spanning AI-driven pharmaceutical development and medical devices, that is intellectual property created on UAE soil, addressing healthcare challenges that would otherwise require imported solutions. When women scientists at Masdar City and Khalifa University advance research in solar energy systems, carbon captured materials, or sustainable desalination, they are producing foundational science that the UAE’s Net-Zero 2050 Strategy depends upon.

Masdar’s WiSER (Women in Sustainability, Environment and Renewable Energy) programme has graduated professional young women from over 30 nationalities, closing the gap in the global sustainability workforce. In healthcare, women scientists are active in the areas where AI, genomics, and precision medicine converge. The Emirati Genome Programme, M42’s Omics Center of Excellence, and the Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center all represent domains where locally produced research can reduce the country’s reliance on imported diagnostics and therapeutics.

From these examples, it is clear that women scientists’ and researchers’ contributions are a central pillar of the national R&D ecosystem.

A Regional And Global Perspective

The UAE’s experience is instructive for the wider region. Across the Arab world, up to 57% of STEM graduates are women, yet the MENA region maintains one of the lowest female workforce participation rates globally at 19%. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 has made notable progress, with women’s workforce participation reaching 36.2% and women now comprising 40.9% of the Kingdom’s researchers. The challenge across the GCC and MENA is consistent: converting educational attainment into sustained professional participation and research output. Globally, only one in three researchers is a woman, and parity in engineering, mathematics, and computer science is not projected until 2052. UNESCO’s 2026 International Day of Women and Girls in Science theme — “From Vision to Impact” — captures this urgency well.

The Way Forward: From Vision To Impact

As an academic working at the intersection of artificial intelligence and healthcare research in Dubai, I witness this potential daily — in students who arrive with rigour and ambition, in researchers producing work that stands alongside the best globally, and in a national ecosystem that increasingly treats women’s scientific participation as a strategic priority rather than a social courtesy. But policies alone do not produce innovation. What produces innovation is funding, access to facilities, clear pathways from research to commercialisation, and the recognition that a woman scientist publishing a patent in the UAE is building national capability in exactly the same way as the infrastructure projects that make headlines.

Sustained commitment is key — from governments, institutions, and the private sector — to ensure that every woman scientist in this region has the funding, the platforms, and the pathways to convert her research into national impact. When women scientists thrive, nations innovate faster. The UAE understands this. Now it must ensure the rest of the ecosystem does too.

Continue Reading

Tech Features

WOMEN IN AI AND DATA SCIENCE: WHO IS BUILDING THE ALGORITHMS THAT SHAPE OUR FUTURE?

Published

on

Dr Maheen Hasib, Global Programme Director for BSc Data Sciences, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Dubai

Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science are no longer distant or experimental ideas. They quietly sit behind many of the decisions that shape our everyday lives: how patients are diagnosed, how job applications are filtered, how loans are approved etc. These systems increasingly influence who gets opportunities and who does not. That reality makes one question impossible to ignore: who is building the algorithms that shape our future?

As a Programme Director for the Data Sciences programme at Heriot-Watt University, this question is not just academic for me, it is deeply personal. Every year, I meet capable, curious, and motivated young women who are genuinely interested in data science. Yet many hesitate. Not because they lack ability, but because they are unsure whether they truly belong in the field. Too often, they do not see people (like themselves) reflected in AI research, technical teams, or leadership roles. And that absence matters.

When bias in AI feels uncomfortably familiar

AI systems are often described as objective or neutral, yet they are trained in data shaped by human history, something that is far from neutral. When training data reflects existing gender imbalances, AI systems can replicate and even magnify those patterns. This has led to technologies that perform less accurately for women, fail to capture women’s health needs, or disadvantage women in recruitment and evaluation processes.

For many women, these outcomes feel uncomfortably familiar. They echo everyday experiences of being overlooked, misunderstood, or underrepresented. In most cases, this is not the result of deliberate exclusion. It is the consequence of design choices made without diverse perspectives at the table.

Why representation goes beyond numbers

Representation in AI and data science is often discussed in terms of statistics or diversity targets. But at its core, representation is about perspective. When women are involved in developing AI systems, they help shape how problems are defined, what data are considered relevant, and which risks are taken seriously.

From an academic perspective, diverse teams produce more robust research and better-tested models. From a human perspective, they help ensure that AI systems work for the full range of people they are meant to serve. Inclusion improves both technical quality and social impact, it strengthens the science and the society it serves.

Women and the future of ethical AI

Many women working in AI are already at the forefront of discussions around fairness, transparency, explainability, and responsible data use. These are not peripheral concerns; they are central to building trustworthy AI. Ethical AI requires asking difficult questions: Who might be harmed when a system fails? Whose data is missing? Who is affected by design decisions that seem minor on the surface?

By advocating for human-centered approaches, women in AI are helping shift the field beyond purely performance-driven metrics toward systems that balance innovation with responsibility.

Education, encouragement, and visibility matter

At Heriot-Watt University Dubai, we make a deliberate effort to encourage women to pursue data science, not just as a degree, but as a long-term career. This means creating supportive learning environments, highlighting female role models, and openly discussing the wide range of paths that data science can lead to. Students need to see that success in AI does not follow a single template.

Equally important are spaces where women can connect, share experiences, and feel supported. As an ambassador for Women in Data Science, I have seen how such events play a vital role. They create visibility, build confidence, and remind women that they are not alone. We need more of these initiatives, not as one-off celebrations, but as sustained platforms for mentorship, networking, and growth.

Encouraging women in AI is not about lowering standards or meeting quotas. It is about recognizing that inclusive participation leads to better research, more ethical technologies, and systems that genuinely reflect the societies they shape.

Conclusion

As AI and data science continue to influence our world, we must ask not only what these systems do, but who designs them. Supporting women to study data science, pursue AI careers, and step into leadership roles is essential to building technologies that are fair, responsible, and trustworthy. Through education, visibility, and initiatives, we can help ensure that the future of AI is shaped by many voices.

The future of AI should be one where women do not simply use technology but actively shape it.

Continue Reading

Tech Features

INSIDE THE TECHNOLOGY THAT MAKES HUAWEI FREECLIP THE BEST OPEN-EAR EARBUDS!

Published

on

White HUAWEI FreeClip open‑ear earbuds inside an open charging case on a table, with a smartphone, Christmas tree, lights, and wrapped gift boxes in the background.

It has been two years since the debut of the original HUAWEI FreeClip, Huawei’s first-ever open earbuds that took the market by storm. Its massive popularity proved that the world was ready for a new kind of listening experience. The new HUAWEI FreeClip 2 tackles the hard challenges of open-ear acoustics physics head-on, combining a powerful dual-diaphragm driver with computational audio. It delivers depth and clarity, which was once thought impossible with an open-ear design.

Solving the acoustic limitations of open-ear audio alone would have been sufficient to make the HUAWEI FreeClip 2 our pick for best open-ear audio. But it is way more than that.

Comfortable C-Bridge design

The HUAWEI FreeClip 2 earbuds weigh only 5.1 g per bud, a 9% reduction from the previous generation. This lightweight architecture ensures an effortless experience, perfect for long calls, workouts, and commutes, allowing you to wear them all day without fatigue. The comfort bean is 11% smaller than the previous model, yet the design provides a secure fit that prevents the earbuds from falling out, even during intense activity.

Constructed from a new skin-friendly liquid silicone and a shape-memory alloy, the C-bridge is 25% softer and significantly more flexible than its predecessor. Finished with a fine, textured surface, it ensures a comfortable, irritation-free wearing even after extended use.

Adaptive open-ear listening

The acoustic system has been significantly upgraded, featuring a dual-diaphragm driver and a multi-mic call noise cancellation system. This setup not only delivers powerful sound but also maximises space efficiency. That’s why, despite their small size, these earbuds can deliver substantial acoustic performance.

The Open-fit design of the earbuds demands high computing power to maintain sound quality and call clarity. The HUAWEI FreeClip 2 offers ten times the processing power of the previous generation, serving as Huawei’s first earbuds to feature an NPU AI processor for a truly adaptive experience. The new dual-diaphragm driver includes a single dynamic driver with two diaphragms, effectively doubling the sound output within a compact space to provide a significant boost in volume and bass response.

Furthermore, the earbuds dynamically detect surrounding noise and adjust volume and voice levels in real-time. If the environment is too noisy, the system uses adaptive voice enhancement to specifically boost human frequencies, ensuring you never miss a word of a podcast or audiobook. When you return to a quiet environment, the earbuds automatically settle back to a comfortable volume level.

Crystal clear calls

To ensure call quality in chaotic environments, the HUAWEI FreeClip 2 utilises a three-mic system combined with multi-channel DNN (Deep Neural Network) noise cancellation algorithms. This system intelligently identifies and filters out ambient noise. Thanks to the NPU AI processor, the earbuds automatically enhance voice clarity, ensuring your conversations remain crisp regardless of your surroundings.

Battery life and charging

With the charging case, the HUAWEI FreeClip 2 offers a total battery life of 38 hours, allowing users to enjoy music throughout a full week of commuting on a single charge. On their own, the earbuds last for 9 hours—enough for a full workday of uninterrupted calls. For those in a rush, just 10 minutes of fast charging in the case provides up to 3 hours of playback. For added convenience, they support wireless charging and are compatible with watch chargers.

Rated IP57, the earbuds are resistant to sweat and water. They can easily withstand intense workouts or even a downpour.

Connectivity

The earbuds support dual connections and seamless auto-switching across iOS, Android, and Windows. When connected to EMUI devices, you can even switch audio between more than two devices. Additionally, when connected to a PC, the earbuds allow you to answer an incoming call without disconnecting from or interrupting your conference setup.

It is, quite simply, a pair of earphones reliable enough for the gym, the office, and the commute.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 | The Integrator