Connect with us

Tech Features

Why AI Transformation is a Human Imperative, and the Role the CHRO Must Play

Published

on

A year after IBM’s Deep Blue defeated Garry Kasparov in 1997, Kasparov did something unexpected. Rather than retreat, he invented a new form of chess he called ‘advanced chess’, pairing human players with computers to see what they could produce together. The result was remarkable. Even moderately skilled players, armed with a standard machine, were capable of defeating both grandmasters playing alone and computers operating without human input. The combination was categorically superior to either element in isolation.

By: David Henderson , Group CHRO, Al-Futtaim 

That experiment carries an important lesson for organisations navigating AI today. The instinct understandable, but mistaken, is to frame AI as a technology story. It is not. AI reshapes jobs, redistributes decision rights, resets operating models, and forces us to reconsider deeply embedded ways of working. It intersects directly with creativity, cognition, confidence, identity and employability. It produces as many human questions as it does technical ones.

This is why the organizations that are genuinely converting AI from experiment into competitive advantage are those that have understood it, first and foremost, as a large-scale human transformation, one that demands the business, the CHRO and the CIO working as genuine partners, each bringing what the other cannot.

The organisations winning with AI are not those with the most sophisticated technology. They are those that have most deliberately redesigned how humans and machines work together.

The Case for the CHRO

The most effective AI transformations are driven by a tight three-way partnership:

the business setting the agenda and owning outcomes,

the CIO providing the technology platforms,

data infrastructure and governance,

and the CHRO leading the human transformation that determines whether AI delivers value at scale or stalls in pilots.

Each is essential. None is sufficient alone.

What has changed is the recognition that the human dimension, the design of work and decision rights, the building of workforce capability, the management of trust and ethics, the orchestration of adoption across large and diverse employee populations, is not downstream of the technology. It is a primary enabler of it. That is the CHRO’s territory, and it demands the same strategic weight as the technology agenda itself.

In this paper, I propose a model for how CHROs can lead AI enablement through four interconnected roles: Design Architect, Capability Steward, Adoption Catalyst, and Transition Guardian. Each role addresses a distinct dimension of the human transformation that AI demands. Together, they represent a holistic operating mandate for CHROs who are serious about delivering sustained enterprise value from AI, not just deploying tools.

01) Design Architect: Redesigning work, roles and decision rights for the AI era

AI transformation fails far more often because of organisational design choices than because of technology limitations. When companies deploy AI tools without redesigning how work is done, decision rights blur, accountability erodes, adoption stalls, and productivity gains remain trapped in pilots. The technology is rarely the binding constraint. The organisation almost always is.

The CHRO’s role as Design Architect is to get ahead of that problem. This means providing overarching direction on how work should be redesigned so that human judgment and AI-generated insight are deliberately combined, not accidentally layered on top of each other. It means clarifying which decisions remain human-led, which are AI-supported, and where accountability ultimately sits. And it means building an operating model architecture that is dynamic enough to evolve as AI capabilities continue to develop rapidly.

In my own experience, incrementalism in this domain is almost always destined to fail. The organisations that are getting this right are making bold, decisive design choices, and in some cases, breaking up parts of the organisation that have long been treated as untouchable.

In Practice — Procter & Gamble
P&G redesigned decision models across forecasting, procurement and product innovation so that AI produces insights and options while humans retain final say on portfolio bets, supplier strategy and innovation priorities.

Critically, AI was embedded directly into logistics decision forums — rather than remaining siloed in group-level analytics teams, removing information-sharing barriers and enabling real-time decision-making at scale.

In Practice — Microsoft
Microsoft intentionally redesigned all knowledge-work roles so that AI copilots handle drafting, synthesis and retrieval, while employees retain judgment, prioritisation and accountability. The result was not simply cost reduction,it was the redeployment of released cognitive capacity into revenue-generating innovation and customer experience improvement.

Being intentional on organisational design means staying one step ahead of technological adoption, not one step behind it. The CHRO must proactively reimagine how AI reshapes the value chain and translate that vision into operating model decisions — rather than reactively course-correcting after tools have already been deployed.

02) Capability Steward: Building enterprise-wide, continuous learning systems that keep pace with AI

In the AI era, capability, not technology, is the primary constraint on value creation. The organisations that are scaling AI effectively are not those with the most sophisticated tools. They are those whose people know how to use them confidently, critically, and productively in the context of real work.

The CHRO’s role as Capability Steward is to build the learning infrastructure that makes this possible at scale. This means moving decisively away from episodic, one-size-fits-all training models, which are structurally unsuited to the pace of AI change, towards continuous, contextual learning systems that are embedded in daily workflows.

It means developing AI fluency across the workforce, not just in specialist teams. And it means maintaining ongoing insight into which capabilities are emerging, shifting or declining as the skills economy evolves.

In Practice — Amazon

Amazon treats AI capability as core workforce infrastructure rather than a specialist skill. It has built role-specific learning pathways combining foundational AI fluency with immediate, in-role application, particularly in operations, logistics and corporate functions.

The result has been faster adoption of AI tools across large frontline and corporate populations, with measurable productivity gains driven by applied capability rather than isolated expertise.
From My Experience — Zurich Insurance

During my time at Zurich, we built an enterprise-wide AI and digital capability ecosystem that combined broad AI literacy with deep domain-specific learning for underwriters, claims handlers and risk professionals. Learning was continuous and embedded in daily workflows.

Critically, we also focused on transferable skill identification, enabling us, for example, to rapidly retrain and redeploy claims handlers as customer service agents based on strong overlaps in their underlying skill profiles. That flexibility became a genuine competitive asset.

The CHRO must protect long-term capability health and resilience, not simply optimise for short-term productivity. Organisations that treat AI learning as a one-time training event will struggle to sustain adoption. Those that build continuous learning as an organisational capability will compound their advantage over time.

03) Adoption Catalyst: Empowering employees as co-creators of AI value, not passive recipients of it

Many CHROs of my generation were trained in a change management orthodoxy that starts at the top of the house, guiding coalition, executive sponsorship, structured project timelines. That model is not wrong, but it is increasingly insufficient for AI.

Top-down governance and strategy remain essential. But scalable AI value does not come from mandates. It comes from the bottom up, from employees who understand the work and are empowered to apply AI where insight is deepest and value most immediate.

The CHRO’s role as Adoption Catalyst is to create the conditions for this to happen: building cultures of experimentation and knowledge-sharing, aligning incentives and recognition to reward participation, and enabling employees to co-create AI use cases rather than simply receive them.

This is a fundamental shift from change management to what I would call change orchestration, leaders creating the environment in which adoption flourishes, rather than driving it through compliance.

In Practice — Al-Futtaim Blue Loyalty Platform

The clearest proof point I can offer comes from our own experience at Al-Futtaim. The group’s Blue Loyalty Platform uses AI to combine behavioural, transactional and partner data to deliver personalised offers and purchase recommendations across our retail and service channels.

What made this work was not central design — it was that the use cases were developed by multi-disciplinary frontline retail employees, working in agile action-learning teams, applying their direct customer insight to build the recommendations.

AI was embedded into frontline and digital workflows by the people who understood those workflows best. The result has been measurable revenue uplift driven by use cases rooted in real customer interactions — not boardroom hypotheses.
In Practice — Google

Google runs AI adoption through a culture of experimentation supported by internal communities, shared tooling and lightweight governance. Employees apply AI to improve workflows, products and services; successful use cases are productised and scaled through internal platforms. This produces rapid diffusion of best practices, strong employee ownership, and continuous improvement generated by those doing the work.

Employees need to define the tools they need , not simply learn the tools they are given. That distinction is everything when it comes to whether AI adoption takes root or stalls.

Bottom-up adoption is not a cultural nicety. It is the mechanism through which AI becomes embedded, differentiated and commercially meaningful at scale. Organisations that get this right do not deploy AI. They make AI part of how the organisation thinks.

04) Transition Guardian: Ensuring AI adoption is ethical, transparent, and in the long-term interest of employees

AI introduces legitimate concerns that the CHRO cannot afford to minimise: fairness, transparency, surveillance, bias, job security, long-term employability. If these concerns are not addressed proactively and honestly, trust erodes, and without trust, adoption stalls regardless of how good the technology is.

The CHRO’s role as Transition Guardian is to ensure that AI adoption is consistent with organisational values and strengthens, rather than undermines, the employee value proposition.

This means embedding ethical guardrails and human oversight into AI adoption from the outset, not retrofitting them under regulatory pressure. It means communicating honestly with employees about what AI will change, what it will not change, and what pathways exist for reskilling and redeployment.

And it means treating strategic workforce planning not as an HR administrative function, but as a core enabler of organisational resilience.

Today’s employees need to focus less on specific target jobs and more on building transferable skill profiles that will serve them across a career that is certain to be turbulent. They need to feel that their organisation has their back. The CHRO must make that commitment credible, not through reassurance, but through concrete pathways.

In Practice — Salesforce

Salesforce has embedded ethical and responsible AI as a prerequisite for scale rather than a control imposed after deployment. The company requires mandatory Responsible AI training, applies humanin-the-loop oversight for AI-enabled decisions, and maintains clear disclosure standards when AI influences employee or customer outcomes.

The trust this generates has driven faster adoption, stronger employee engagement, and meaningfully reduced legal, regulatory and reputational risk.
In Practice — Unilever

Unilever explicitly links AI adoption to employability and internal mobility. As AI reshapes roles, the company invests heavily in reskilling and redeployment pathways, reframing AI as augmentation rather than displacement.

Workforce planning, learning and ethics are intentionally connected rather than siloed , and employees can see a credible future for themselves within the transformation.

Trust is not a soft outcome of AI transformation. It is the hard prerequisite for scaling it. The CHRO who treats it as such will find that ethical, transparent AI adoption does not slow the transformation down — it is the thing that makes it durable.

The CHRO Skill set for AI Enablement

Having defined the four roles the CHRO must play, it is worth being specific about the skills and attributes required to execute each one. In an environment where AI success is increasingly determined by organisational design, capability building, adoption dynamics and trust, not technology, these capabilities define whether the CHRO is shaping the transformation or reacting to it.

Design ArchitectCapability StewardAdoption CatalystTransition Guardian
Operating Model DesignLearning at ScaleChange OrchestrationEthical Judgement
Work & Role DeconstructionAI Fluency TranslationEmployee Empowerment MindsetTrust Stewardship
Decision Rights ClaritySkills Architecture & Workforce SensingIncentive & Recognition DesignStrategic Workforce Planning
Systems ThinkingAction Learning SystemsBusiness Experimentation LiteracyRisk Anticipation
Enterprise Co-CreationFuture Capability StewardshipCultural Signal AwarenessClear, Honest Communication

A few points of emphasis.

As Design Architect, the most underrated skill is enterprise co-creation — the confidence and credibility to act as a genuine co-owner of AI strategy with the CIO and business leaders, not merely as a supporting function.

As Capability Steward, future capability stewardship is distinct from short-term productivity optimization; CHROs must protect long-term organisational resilience, not just near-term performance.

As Adoption Catalyst, cultural signal awareness is often more powerful than formal programmes, leadership language and behaviour either accelerate or silently undermine adoption at scale. And as Transition Guardian, clear and honest communication, including on uncertainty and difficult tradeoffs, is the foundation on which all of the other skills rest.

Without it, none of the others land.

Conclusion: The Human Transformation Imperative

Organisations that are genuinely winning with AI are not those with the most sophisticated technology stacks. They are those that have most deliberately and thoughtfully redesigned how humans and machines work together, rethinking operating models, building capability at scale, empowering employees as co-creators, and managing the transition with ethics and transparency.

The CHRO who grasps this, who acts as Design Architect, Capability Steward, Adoption Catalyst and Transition Guardian simultaneously, becomes one of the most important executives in the organisation. Not because HR has staked a claim to a technology agenda, but because the most important levers for AI value creation are organisational and human, and those are precisely the levers that CHROs are equipped to pull.

Kasparov’s advanced chess experiment showed us, a quarter of a century ago, that the most powerful outcomes emerge not from humans or machines working alone, but from their deliberate, skillful combination. The CHRO’s mandate is to make that combination work, at enterprise scale, at pace, and without losing the trust of the people it depends on.

That is not a supporting role. It is a defining one.

_______________________________________________________

David Henderson is Group CHRO of Al-Futtaim Group, one of the Middle East's largest diversified conglomerates. He has previously served as CHRO of Zurich Insurance Group, MetLife and PepsiCo.

Tech Features

Networks Must Evolve Before AI Can Scale

Published

on



Rohit Chowdhary, Head of Advanced Consulting Services at Nokia, sat down with The Integrator to share insights into the company’s vision for enabling the AI supercycle. He outlined how Nokia’s end-to-end portfolio spans everything from AI-ready connectivity and energy-efficient 800G data centre networking to intelligent, self-optimising home Wi-Fi experiences powered by AI.

A key focus of the discussion was Nokia’s shift from strategic advisory to real-world execution through its dedicated Automation Excellence Practice, helping operators translate ambitious transformation roadmaps into measurable outcomes. The conversation also highlighted the growing importance of integrated, intelligent and secure networks that can support rising AI workloads, eliminate infrastructure bottlenecks and unlock tangible business value, while maintaining the highest standards of security, privacy and resilience

Could you begin by telling us about your role at Nokia and the journey that brought you here?

I lead Nokia’s Advanced Consulting Services business across Europe, the Middle East and Africa. My journey with Nokia spans nearly seventeen years, beginning at a time when consulting was largely focused on network transformation initiatives. Over the years, I have worked closely with operators around the world on transformation programmes, analytics adoption, customer experience management and digital modernization.

As the industry evolved, so did our consulting focus. Following the Nokia and Alcatel Lucent merger, we established what is today known as Advanced Consulting Services. The organization now spans several domains, including security, business monetization, cloud and technology transformation, autonomous operations, and data and AI.

More recently, we launched an Automation Excellence Practice. The idea was simple. Customers often appreciated our strategic blueprints but needed practical expertise to implement them. Today, we have specialized engineers who combine telecom expertise, AI capabilities and software development skills to turn strategic visions into real automation pipelines, AI-driven workflows and production-ready use cases. Our role is to help customers move from concept to measurable business outcomes.

Nokia is often associated with connectivity, but the company is increasingly talking about AI readiness. How does Nokia’s infrastructure portfolio support this transition?

AI is creating what we describe as an AI supercycle. It is transforming everything from data centres and cloud infrastructure to network architectures and edge computing. Supporting this shift requires a complete ecosystem rather than isolated technologies.

Nokia’s portfolio addresses this across multiple layers. On the network side, we continue to innovate in radio technologies, including AI-RAN capabilities developed alongside strategic partners such as Nvidia. We also have a strong optical networking and IP portfolio that enables the high-capacity connectivity required between data centres, edge locations and cloud environments.

One area that excites me is our innovation in data centre networking. We are introducing highly efficient coherent optical technologies and advanced switching platforms that significantly reduce infrastructure footprints while improving performance and energy efficiency. These innovations are becoming increasingly important as organizations invest in AI factories, AI grids and large-scale inference environments.

Beyond connectivity, we also provide intelligent automation layers through our autonomous networking platforms, enabling operators to manage complex, multi-vendor environments more efficiently and intelligently.

What are some of the biggest infrastructure bottlenecks you see operators and enterprises facing as AI adoption accelerates?

One of the biggest challenges is understanding that AI infrastructure is not just about compute power. Organizations often focus heavily on GPUs and processing capabilities, but connectivity can quickly become the limiting factor.

You can deploy the most powerful AI infrastructure available, but if the network cannot support the required data movement between racks, data centres and edge locations, performance suffers. This is where intelligent networking becomes critical.

At Nokia, we are helping customers design what we call AI-ready connectivity. This includes high-capacity optical networking, intelligent routing and the seamless interconnection of compute environments. As AI workloads become increasingly distributed, the ability to move data efficiently becomes just as important as the ability to process it.

On the consumer side, Nokia has been showcasing AI-driven Wi-Fi management capabilities. How does this improve the end-user experience?

The home network has become far more complex than it was a few years ago. Consumers expect flawless connectivity across multiple devices, applications and services.

Our AI-enabled Wi-Fi solutions continuously monitor network performance and user experience. They can identify coverage gaps, detect congestion, analyze interference patterns and even recommend or automatically implement corrective actions.

The goal is to create a self-optimizing network environment where many issues can be resolved autonomously before they impact the user. This reduces support requirements for service providers while delivering a more consistent and reliable experience for customers.

The Middle East is witnessing an unprecedented surge in data centre investments. How do you see this shaping Nokia’s opportunities in the region?

The Middle East has emerged as one of the most dynamic markets globally for AI infrastructure investments. Governments and enterprises are actively investing in sovereign AI capabilities, advanced data centres and digital ecosystems.

This creates significant opportunities, not only for Nokia but for the broader technology industry. The success of these initiatives depends on having secure, scalable and efficient connectivity between compute resources, cloud environments and end users.

Our role is to help customers build these foundations. Whether it is data centre interconnectivity, optical networking, intelligent routing or autonomous operations, Nokia’s technologies are designed to support the scale and performance requirements of AI-driven economies.

As data volumes continue to grow, security and data sovereignty are becoming increasingly important. How is Nokia addressing these concerns?

Security is deeply embedded into Nokia’s strategy and innovation roadmap. As a European technology company, trust, resilience and security have always been fundamental principles in how we design and operate our solutions.

While we continue to invest heavily in AI innovation, we are equally focused on strengthening security capabilities across our portfolio. This includes advanced network security architectures, AI-driven threat detection and preparations for future technologies such as quantum-safe networking.

We are actively engaged with industry bodies, standards organizations and ecosystem partners to help define the next generation of secure digital infrastructure. As AI becomes increasingly pervasive, security must evolve alongside it, and that is an area where Nokia continues to invest significantly.

Looking ahead, what excites you most about the future of AI-driven networks?

What excites me most is the convergence of AI, automation and connectivity. Networks are evolving from passive transport layers into intelligent platforms that can learn, adapt and optimize themselves.

The future will be defined by autonomous operations, AI-native networks and real-time decision-making at scale. Organizations that successfully combine these capabilities will unlock entirely new business models and levels of operational efficiency.

For us, the opportunity is not just about deploying technology. It is about helping customers transform the way they operate, innovate and create value in an increasingly AI-driven world.

Continue Reading

Tech Features

WHY AUDIO CLARITY MATTERS FOR THE CONTINUITY OF EDUCATION, WORSHIP, AND COLLABORATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Published

on

Spokesperson – Yassine Mannai, Associate Sales Director at Shure MEA

Across the Middle East, continuity is being shaped by the quality of connection people experience every day. In classrooms, places of worship, and collaborative workspaces, that connection often begins with one essential factor: audio clarity. At Shure, we recognised this gap early and understood its growing importance across these environments.

When sound is clear, people stay present. Students follow lessons more easily, engage with greater confidence, and absorb information with less strain. This becomes especially important in hybrid learning environments, where every participant needs to feel equally included, whether they are in the room or joining remotely. Research cited by Shure shows that poor audio affects one-third of all virtual meetings, while four out of five common video conferencing frustrations are linked to audio issues such as background noise, echo, dropouts, and difficulty hearing others.

The same reality carries into places of worship. The ability to hear with clarity shapes how messages are received, how people remain attentive, and how connected they feel to the moment itself. In these spaces, sound supports focus, presence, and the overall quality of the experience.

In workplaces and institutional settings, audio has become central to how teams communicate and make decisions. Strong collaboration depends on being able to hear and respond without friction. As hybrid work continues to reshape professional life, the need for dependable communication systems has become more visible. [1] Shure’s regional insight, referencing IDC research, notes that 67% of professional workers are now at least partially remote, underlining how important it is for institutions to support communication across distributed teams. That understanding has been reflected in the solutions across our portfolio, including the MXA920 Ceiling Array Microphone for hybrid learning, the MXA320 Table Array Microphone for collaboration environments, and the DCA901 Broadcast Microphone Array for places of worship, where audience capture can bring greater depth to livestream experiences.

Across the region, institutions are moving toward smarter, more adaptable spaces where audio performance, system simplicity, and digital integration work together more effectively. Reliable audio has become part of how organisations sustain engagement, support participation, and deliver a better experience for the people who rely on them every day.

Continue Reading

Tech Features

UBER, MICROSOFT MOVES SIGNAL NEW PHASE IN ENTERPRISE AI ADOPTION

Published

on

Expert commentary by Andreas Hassellöf, CEO of Ombori, on how enterprises are turning AI investment into measurable operational value and shifting from experimentation to disciplined adoption centred on workflows, governance, and business outcomes.

Large enterprises are beginning to speak more openly about the growing gap between AI adoption and measurable business outcomes, as companies reassess whether rising AI costs are translating into meaningful productivity gains.

Uber President and COO Andrew Macdonald recently said the company is finding it “harder to justify” increasing AI spending after internal discussions highlighted the difficulty of linking higher usage of AI coding tools such as Claude Code to a proportional increase in useful consumer-facing features. The comments followed reports that Uber had exhausted its 2026 budget for Claude Code within the first four months of the year, while CEO Dara Khosrowshahi confirmed the company is slowing hiring as it increases investment in AI initiatives.

At the same time, Microsoft has reportedly begun reducing internal use of Anthropic’s Claude Code within parts of its business, shifting developers toward GitHub Copilot CLI instead. Reports suggested the move was tied to Microsoft’s broader push toward its own AI ecosystem and internal tooling strategy rather than a retreat from AI adoption itself.

The developments have triggered wider debate around whether enterprises are entering a more measured phase of AI adoption, with greater focus on operational value, integration, and cost management rather than usage alone.

However, Andreas Hassellöf, CEO of Ombori, believes the issue is less about the capability of AI and more about how organisations are adapting to it.

“The real challenge has nothing to do with whether AI can increase productivity. It clearly can,” Hassellöf said. “The harder part is getting people and organisations to adapt how they actually work so the technology delivers results.”

According to Hassellöf, many companies are seeing high adoption rates and surging token consumption but are struggling to convert that activity into measurable business value. “The bottleneck is rarely the technology itself,” he said. “It is how teams change their processes, measure real outcomes, and build new habits around the tools.”

He added that the industry is now entering a more mature phase of enterprise AI adoption, where businesses are beginning to move beyond experimentation and focus instead on operational discipline, governance, and measurable outcomes. Companies that succeed, he said, will be the ones that redesign workflows around AI rather than simply layering tools onto existing processes.

“Just chatting casually with an AI coding tool and expecting it to handle everything is not enough,” Hassellöf said. “It wastes tokens and often creates more problems than it solves.”

Instead, he argues that successful AI implementation requires structured workflows where multiple AI agents handle specialised tasks such as coding, reviewing, testing, and formatting, while humans remain responsible for setting goals, reviewing outputs, and ensuring alignment with business outcomes.

“The technology is powerful, but the human side of adoption will decide whether a company succeeds with AI or whether it becomes just another expensive experiment,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 | The Integrator