Tech Interviews
Digital Sovereignty in Practice: What It Means for Enterprises Today
In our conversation with Ismail Ibrahim, General Manager, CEMEA at SUSE, we seek to understand the concept better along with his understanding of the industry and how enterprises in the UAE and Saudi Arabia can retain control in a rapidly evolving technology landscape.

What does “digital sovereignty” actually mean for an enterprise today, not in theory, but in day-to-day operations?
From an enterprise perspective, digital sovereignty becomes real the moment it changes what you do on a Monday morning. In practice, it means three things become operational requirements, not policy statements.
First, control over data. Not just where data is stored, but where it is processed, who can access it, and how you prove that in an audit. For many organizations in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, that is increasingly tied to sector rules, procurement requirements, and customer expectations.
You need the ability to keep sensitive workloads within national borders when required, but also to enable controlled data flows when innovation demands it. The important point is that sovereignty is not “ringfencing everything”. It is being deliberate about which data, which workloads and which dependencies must remain under your control.
Second, control over operations. Day-to-day, that looks like resilience and predictability: how quickly you can patch, how confidently you can recover, how consistently you can enforce policy across clusters, clouds and edge sites. This is where many enterprises discover that sovereignty is inseparable from operational excellence. If you cannot reliably manage your environments, you do not really control them.
Third, control over technology choices. This is where open source becomes practical, not ideological. When you build on open, enterprise-supported platforms, you are reducing dependency on opaque codebases and constraining the risk of being forced into a single vendor’s roadmap. Sovereignty is “choice by design”, because choice is what allows you to meet local requirements today and change course tomorrow.
That is why at SUSE we often frame sovereignty around pillars like control, choice and resilience, with autonomy as the long-term outcome. For enterprises, those pillars translate into everyday decisions: architecture, procurement, governance, patching, incident response and lifecycle management.
In the next three years, which will hurt enterprises more: security breaches, or being locked into the wrong technology stack?
It is not an either-or, because the two risks are increasingly connected.
A security breach is immediate and visible. It impacts customers, regulators, operations and reputation. But lock-in to the wrong stack can quietly increase breach risk over time, because it limits your ability to respond. If your architecture makes it hard to patch quickly, to segment workloads properly, to implement new controls, or to move sensitive workloads to a compliant environment, you have turned security into a dependency problem.
Over the next three years, I would say the most damaging scenario for many enterprises is not “breach versus lock-in”, but breach plus lock-in, where an organisation is under pressure and finds it cannot adapt fast enough.
This is exactly why sovereignty has moved into the C-suite and boardroom. Leaders are recognizing that digital sovereignty sits alongside cybersecurity and operational resilience as a strategic requirement. You need a risk-based approach to your data, workloads and support model, and you need the flexibility to change course.
Practically, in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, many CIOs are already building mixed environments across on-prem, sovereign cloud, hyperscalers and edge. The goal is not to avoid the cloud. The goal is to avoid a situation where strategic choices are dictated by a single vendor’s constraints. Open, enterprise-grade platforms help you keep the option to move, modernize or localize when needed, without rewriting everything from scratch.
As AI becomes embedded into infrastructure itself, do you believe enterprises are prepared to trust machines with operational decisions, or are we moving faster than governance allows?
In many cases, we are moving faster than governance, but that does not mean enterprises should slow down. It means they should modernize governance at the same pace as adoption.
The key is to separate hype from reality. “Trusting machines” does not mean handing over full autonomy overnight. For most enterprises, AI enters operations in stages.
Stage one is assistive intelligence, where AI helps surface insights, detect anomalies, recommend actions and reduce manual effort. This is where many organizations see quick operational value, especially in areas like observability, incident triage, capacity planning and security monitoring.
Stage two is bounded autonomy, where AI can execute actions within defined guardrails, such as automated scaling, routing, remediation playbooks, or policy-driven security responses. The governance requirement here is clear accountability: what is automated, under what conditions, with what approvals, and what audit trail.
Stage three is agentic operations, where more complex systems handle multi-step tasks across environments. This is the phase where governance must be mature, because the risk is not simply “wrong output”, it is unintended consequences across interconnected systems.
For the UAE and Saudi Arabia, readiness often depends on whether organisations have already done the foundations: standardised platforms, consistent policy enforcement, clean identity and access controls, and modern lifecycle management. If the foundation is fragmented, AI simply accelerates fragmentation.
This is why we are seeing strong interest in approaches that support governance by design, including the ability to run AI solutions in more controlled environments. In many regulated sectors, that includes air-gapped or restricted environments, where organizations want to adopt AI while keeping strict control of data movement and operational boundaries.
My view is that enterprises can absolutely trust AI in operations, but only when they treat trust as an engineering outcome: transparent systems, auditable controls, clear guardrails, and the ability to override. Governance is not a blocker. Governance is what makes adoption sustainable.
By 2030, will enterprises still control their infrastructure choices, or will hyperscalers and AI vendors effectively decide that for them?
Enterprises will control their choices if they design for control now. If they do not, the market will make the decision for them.
By 2030, the default buying motion will push organizations toward managed services, vertically integrated AI stacks, and increasingly opinionated platforms. That can deliver speed, but it can also compress choice, especially if your applications, data pipelines, security controls and operational tooling are tightly coupled to one vendor.
So the question is really about architecture and leverage. Enterprises that prioritise portability, standardization and open platforms will keep leverage. They can choose the right environment for each workload, based on performance, compliance, cost, and risk. Enterprises that ignore portability will find that “choice” exists on paper, but not in practice.
This is where digital sovereignty is often misunderstood. Sovereignty does not mean rejecting global technology. It means retaining the ability to make deliberate decisions about where workloads run and who controls the critical layers. Many leaders now talk about “glocal” strategies: using global innovation while maintaining local control and compliance where it matters.
At SUSE, our positioning has been consistent: open source supports sovereignty because it promotes transparency, portability and freedom from lock-in. That is not a slogan, it is a practical roadmap for keeping infrastructure choices in the hands of enterprises, not vendors.
If you had to offer one piece of advice to CIOs and policymakers in the UAE and Saudi Arabia navigating rapid digital transformation, what would it be?
My one piece of advice is this: treat sovereignty as an enabler of innovation, not a constraint, and build it into your operating model early.
For CIOs, that means starting with a clear map of your critical workloads and dependencies. Decide what must remain under national control, what can run on hyperscalers, what needs sovereign cloud options, and what requires special governance. Then standardize your foundations so you can enforce policy consistently. When sovereignty is engineered into the platform layer, transformation becomes faster, because you are not negotiating compliance from scratch every time you modernize an application.
For policymakers, it means continuing to create frameworks that encourage both innovation and trust. The UAE has taken a pragmatic approach in showing that openness and sovereignty do not have to conflict. When the policy environment supports clear requirements and predictable compliance expectations, enterprises can innovate with confidence.
And for both, there is a shared point: invest in skills and ecosystem capability. Sovereign outcomes are not delivered by policy alone, they are delivered by people, platforms, and partnerships. When you develop local talent, strengthen the partner ecosystem, and support enterprise-grade open source, you build resilience and long-term autonomy without slowing innovation.
Tech Interviews
Securing the Future of Enterprise AI: WSO2’s Middle East Strategy
Exclusive interview with Uday Shankar Khizepat – Vice President and General Manager for ME
How is WSO2 sailing through in the region amidst the uncertainty?
The Middle East continues to be one of the most dynamic technology markets globally. While there is uncertainty in the broader geopolitical and economic environment, we see that organizations across the region remain committed to their digital transformation programs and continue to invest in the areas of API modernization, application integration, Identity and access management, data connectivity, cloud transformation and AI enablement. This is because digitization is now a business necessity rather than a discretionary investment.
For WSO2, this has translated into continued demand for solutions that help enterprises modernize systems, securely manage digital identities, integrate increasingly complex technology landscapes, and adopt AI responsibly. We are seeing particularly strong interest from government, financial services, telecommunications, and energy sectors, where organizations are focused on improving operational agility while maintaining security, compliance, and resilience.
Any new products / solutions that have been introduced for the region?
One of the most significant developments for us is our vision for the Agentic Enterprise and the introduction of WSO2’s Agentic Enterprise Fabric. Rather than treating AI as a standalone capability or bolt-on feature, we have embedded AI capabilities into the very fabric of our platform.
The Agentic Enterprise Fabric enables organizations to securely connect data, APIs, applications, identities, and AI agents across the enterprise. This creates a foundation where intelligent agents can operate with the right context, governance, and security controls while delivering measurable business outcomes.
The WSO2 Agent Manager is an open platform for the full life-cycle of enterprise grade AI agents. The WSO2 AI gateway helps in governance by monitoring the usage, applying guardrails, optimizing costs & exposing APIs as MCP tools so that AI agents can safely interact. The WSO2 agent ID helps to register, authenticate, authorize and audit AI agents as first class identities.
This approach is resonating strongly in the Middle East, where organizations are moving beyond AI experimentation and looking for scalable, enterprise-grade AI implementations that can be governed and integrated into existing business processes.
What are the key solutions that have kept WSO2 ahead of its other competitors in the region?
Our differentiation comes from helping customers address key critical challenges simultaneously: APIs, integration, identity, and AI adoption.
Our API management platform helps companies ship, govern and monetize APIs, AI and MCP across any gateway or any cloud. Our integration capabilities enable organizations to connect legacy and modern systems quickly, helping accelerate digital initiatives. Our identity and access management solutions provide the security and trust layer needed for large-scale digital services. Last but not the least, our Agentic Enterprise Fabric brings AI into the core of the enterprise architecture rather than layering it on top as an afterthought.
All of this combined with our open-source heritage, flexible deployment options, and ability to support sovereign cloud and hybrid environments, gives customers the freedom to innovate with zero lock-in. This flexibility is critical in the Middle East region, where organizations increasingly prioritize digital sovereignty, data control, and long-term technology independence.
What are your plans for the coming few months in the region?
Our commitment to the growth and development of the Middle East region remains. We have just completed registering our office in KSA which reiterates our focus on deepening our engagement with customers and partners across the GCC and wider Middle East. We are investing in helping organizations move from AI pilots to production-ready deployments, while continuing to support large-scale modernization and digital transformation initiatives.
We also plan to strengthen our partner ecosystem, expand our presence in key markets, and work more closely with organizations pursuing digital sovereignty initiatives. As governments and enterprises accelerate their AI and digital agendas, we see significant opportunities to help them build secure, connected, and intelligent digital platforms for the future.
What’s your anticipated growth for the digital / tech sector in the coming few years?
The outlook remains very positive and we are optimistic. Over the next three to five years, I believe the region will move from digital transformation to intelligent transformation, where AI becomes embedded in core business operations rather than existing as isolated applications. Organizations that successfully combine AI with strong integration, identity, governance, and data foundations will be best positioned to create sustainable competitive advantages.
This shift will create significant opportunities for technology providers, system integrators, and enterprises alike.
Tech Interviews
INSIDE THE RISE OF AI INFLUENCERS WITH IDEA FARM
Exclusive interview with Lewis Davey, Co-Founder Pixelagency.ai Founder & Creative Director at IDEA FARM
You’ve built a career around making brands culturally relevant through human creativity. What convinced you that the next frontier of storytelling might involve entirely virtual personalities?
AI Influencers have been around since 2018, but the technology has made huge strides in the past 18 months – and now hyper-realistic virtual personalities are exploding in popularity. Having worked in PR for 16 years, I think it’s good to be curious and I committed myself to learning about this space and becoming a bit of an expert – I was particularly interested in how brands could leverage AI Influencers as a new marketing channel. At Pixel what we present to brands is how AI Influencers can solve specific business challenges, drive efficiencies, and reach new audiences. This technology is much more than fancy images on Instagram.
Launching the world’s first AI Influencer Talent Management Agency sounds less like a business expansion and more like a prediction. What future did you see emerging that others weren’t paying attention to?
We launched Pixel 18 months ago with the intention of operating like a traditional talent management agency, connecting brands with existing AI Influencers. It’s certainly evolved, as the industry has gained more traction – and we’re banking on all brands owning their own AI Ambassador in the future.
Pixel isn’t just representing AI influencers, it’s helping brands create them. Why do you believe ownership of digital talent will become strategically important for brands?
Custom build AI Influencers is where we think the future is for brands. This is desirable for brands because they have an always-on marketing asset that can be online 24/7, with full creative control and tailored brand messaging. The AI Influencer can slot into their influencer portfolio, working alongside human influencers.
How do cultural sensitivities in the Middle East actually strengthen the case for AI Ambassadors rather than limit them?
I’ve always felt strongly that the Middle East is the perfect market for AI Ambassadors to thrive. There are reputational risks that come with working with real influencers, whereas a brand can have full control over messaging with its own AI Ambassadors. There’s 200 nationalities in Dubai – the other big selling point for AI Ambassadors is they can communicate in hundreds of languages, giving brands a versatile asset to target different demographics.
From a technology standpoint, what sits behind a successful AI Ambassador today, generative AI, language models, synthetic media, behavioural design, or something else entirely?
Of course, technology is important, and through our exclusive deal with The Clueless – the team behind the world’s biggest AI Influencer, Aitana Lopez, we’re bringing the best Gen-AI tools and talent to the GCC. But for me, it’s still the importance of the human behind the AI Ambassador – this is typically talented creatives, or social content creators, planning content schedules, leaning into culture and trends, and engaging with followers. Humans still have an important role in the storytelling element.
What safeguards should exist as AI-generated personalities become increasingly indistinguishable from humans?
It’s a fast-moving industry, and new rules and regulations will undoubtedly continue to come in. The EU will release new legislation in August, which could include the requirement of a watermark. The main one right now, which all our clients follow, is AI disclosure on Instagram. In an industry witnessing significant change, it’s important that responsible operators like Pixel and other partners work together to steer the industry in the right direction.
In an era of misinformation and rapidly evolving news cycles, how valuable is having a communication asset that is always accurate, controlled, and aligned with brand values?
I think it’s super important. During the recent conflict, we saw a segment of human influencers become unreliable, either posting misleading or sensationalised content. That’s troublesome for brands, so owning their own AI Ambassador that aligns with their values is going to become increasingly important. Now is the perfect time for brands in the Middle East to future proof their influencer strategy and consider an AI Ambassador.
Tech Interviews
STRENGTHENING CYBERSECURITY WITHOUT COMPLEXITY
Exclusive interview with Rabih Itani, Regional Director, Middle East and Africa, WatchGuard Technologies
SMEs across the region often struggle to balance cybersecurity investment with operational costs and complexity. What practical steps can smaller businesses take today to strengthen cyber resilience without overwhelming their internal IT resources?
Cybersecurity does not need to be complex to be effective for SMEs. The priority should be implementing a small number of high-impact security controls that significantly reduce risks. These include enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), maintaining a disciplined patch management process, deploying endpoint protection, securing emails and DNS traffic, and investing in regular employee awareness training to combat phishing and credential misuse.
The urgency is clear. Our recent H2 2025 Internet Security Report revealed that 96 per cent of blocked malware was delivered through encrypted TLS connections, while 23 per cent of threats evaded traditional signature-based detection methods. At the same time, cloud adoption has expanded the attack surface, introducing risks associated with shadow IT, risky SaaS configurations, and compromised identities.
However, SMEs do not need to tackle these challenges alone. According to our 2026 global MSP survey, nearly half of organisations already rely on external providers to augment internal IT teams, while more than half cite 24/7 monitoring as a capability they cannot deliver in-house. WatchGuard’s Unified Security Platform was designed to support this model, delivering integrated protection across network, endpoint, identity, and cloud environments through a simplified, scalable approach. Partnering with a trusted MSP gives SMEs access to managed detection and response, continuous monitoring, and threat intelligence at scale.
Why are ransomware, phishing, and identity-based attacks increasingly becoming board-level business risks rather than just IT concerns?
Cybersecurity has evolved from an IT issue into a business-critical risk because the consequences of a successful attack extend far beyond technology systems. Ransomware, phishing, and identity-based attacks can disrupt operations, expose sensitive data, damage brand reputation, impact customer trust, and trigger regulatory scrutiny, all of which have direct financial and strategic implications.
This shift is reflected in boardroom priorities. Our 2026 MSP survey found that 75 per cent of organisations expect cybersecurity spending to increase over the next two years, while 67 per cent require additional support managing compliance obligations. Security is now firmly embedded in broader business planning and risk management discussions.
The threat landscape reinforces this reality. The survey revealed that 33 per cent of organisations experienced malware infiltration in the past year, 32 per cent suffered phishing or business email compromise attacks, and 29 per cent reported data breaches or unauthorised access incidents. Nearly 75 per cent experienced at least one cybersecurity incident overall. In February 2026, the UAE Cybersecurity Council highlighted increasing attacks targeting critical infrastructure, including ransomware, network infiltration, and AI-enabled offensive tools.
Our H2 2025 Internet Security Report further documented a 1,548 per cent increase in unique malware during Q4 2025, alongside nearly 2,600 public ransomware extortion incidents in a single quarter. Considering this, cybersecurity can no longer be considered a technical concern. Boards require visibility into organisational risk, resilience, and response readiness to protect business continuity and long-term growth.
Many businesses still operate with fragmented security environments built around multiple standalone tools. Why do you believe unified cybersecurity platforms are becoming increasingly important for organizations looking to simplify security operations while improving visibility and protection?
Currently, complexity is one of the greatest challenges facing cybersecurity teams. Organisations relying on multiple disconnected tools often struggle with fragmented security environments, inconsistent policy enforcement, and slower incident response times. Security teams are forced to correlate alerts across different dashboards, slowing response and increasing the risk of missed threats.
Modern cyberattacks do not target a single environment. It moves across endpoints, identities, networks, and cloud applications simultaneously, which requires an integrated approach to detection and response. Our Unified Security Platform combines network security, endpoint protection, identity management, cloud visibility, and threat intelligence into a single coordinated ecosystem. Solutions such as our CloudDR further enhance visibility by identifying shadow IT, detecting identity threats, and automatically remediating misconfigurations.
Market demands reflect this transition. Our 2026 MSP survey found that organisations are prioritising faster incident response (38 per cent), better communication and greater transparency (31 per cent), AI-driven threat detection (44 per cent), and stronger identity and access security capabilities (35 per cent). Meanwhile, 58 per cent expect to switch providers within three years, citing rising costs without added value (39 per cent), a major security incident (39 per cent), and slow response times (36 per cent) as the primary triggers. A unified platform helps address these challenges by reducing operational complexity while improving both security effectiveness and customer experience.
Having worked across the technological ecosystem as an end user, integrator, and provider, how have you seen cybersecurity conversations evolve over the past decade, and what do you believe organizations across the region are still underestimating today?
Cybersecurity conversations have changed significantly over the past decade. Organisations have moved beyond a traditional focus on perimeter security and compliance checklists toward a broader emphasis on cyber resilience, identity protection, cloud security, and business continuity.
One of the most encouraging developments has been the evolution of the customer-provider relationship. In our recent 2026 MSP survey, we found that nearly half of organisations now view their MSP as either a strategic advisor (24 per cent) or a proactive partner (23 per cent), rather than simply a technology supplier. Businesses increasingly expect guidance, expertise, and measurable outcomes, not just products.
However, numerous organisations still underestimate the operational side of cybersecurity. While investments in technologies continue to grow, areas such as identity governance, employee training and awareness, incident response planning, and policy enforcement often receive less attention. Across the Middle East region, we can see a robust commitment from leadership teams to strengthen cybersecurity, but execution gaps remain, particularly in cloud security and identity management.
As cyber threats continue evolving, what are some of the most common mistakes businesses still make when approaching cybersecurity strategies today?
One of the most common mistakes organisations make is viewing cybersecurity as a collection of tools rather than an ongoing operational strategy. Many businesses invest heavily in multiple security solutions but lack the resources, expertise, or processes required to manage them effectively. The result is often alert fatigue, fragmented visibility, and slower incident response. This is where dedicated MSPs play a major role. The data is compelling. Around 94 per cent of organisations using a dedicated MSP or MSSP report confidence in their protection against emerging threats, compared to just 83 per cent of those relying on consulting or professional services firms.
Another persistent challenge is underestimating identity-based risk. Today’s attackers increasingly prefer to exploit stolen credentials and over-privileged identities rather than breach networks directly. Our H2 2025 Threat Report highlights the growing prevalence of identity-focused attack techniques, underscoring the need for stronger access controls, continuous monitoring, and proactive detection capabilities.
Currently, organisations continue to underestimate the human element of cybersecurity. Our 2026 MSP survey found that 37 per cent of businesses want more cybersecurity awareness training, while 31 per cent seek greater communication and transparency from their security providers. Technology alone cannot deliver resilience; people and processes remain equally important.
Ultimately, resilient organisations are those that take a holistic approach, combining strong identity security, MFA, endpoint protection, employee awareness and training, and tested incident response plans within a single, continuously managed cybersecurity strategy.
-
News11 years ago
SENDQUICK (TALARIAX) INTRODUCES SQOOPE – THE BREAKTHROUGH IN MOBILE MESSAGING
-
Trending8 months agoOPPO A6 Pro 5G Review: Reliable Daily Driver
-
Tech News2 years agoDenodo Bolsters Executive Team by Hiring Christophe Culine as its Chief Revenue Officer
-
VAR1 year agoMicrosoft Launches New Surface Copilot+ PCs for Business
-
Automotive2 years agoAGMC Launches the RIDDARA RD6 High Performance Fully Electric 4×4 Pickup
-
Tech Interviews2 years ago
Navigating the Cybersecurity Landscape in Hybrid Work Environments
-
Tech News11 months agoNothing Launches flagship Nothing Phone (3) and Headphone (1) in theme with the Iconic Museum of the Future in Dubai
-
VAR2 years agoSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Clash Of The Folding Phenoms


