Financial
THE INFORMATION PARADOX IN MODERN MARKETS: WHY MORE DATA DEMANDS BETTER JUDGEMENT

By Roberto d’Ambrosio – CEO at Axiory
Financial markets in 2026 are producing more information than at any point in history. Earnings data, geopolitical alerts, AI-generated analysis, social media commentary, and real-time price feeds reach investors continuously, relentlessly, and from every direction. The conventional assumption is that this abundance is empowering. More data, the argument goes, means better-informed decisions. From my experience across more than three decades in financial services, the reality is considerably more complicated, and for many investors, the opposite is closer to the truth.
Access to information is not the same as the capacity to process it. When data exceeds the ability of the individual to filter, interpret, and act on it with clarity, the result is not better decision-making. It is hesitation, reactive behaviour, and a false sense of confidence that having seen the data is the same as having understood it. Research published by the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve has confirmed what practitioners have long observed: information overload is associated with lower trading volumes and measurably higher risk premia, as investors demand greater compensation for holding assets in an environment where they can no longer reliably distinguish signal from noise. The effect is not marginal. It is structural, and it worsens precisely when markets are most volatile and when clear thinking matters most.
This is particularly relevant for the Middle East. The GCC’s retail investment sector has expanded rapidly, with neo brokerages and digital trading platforms now comprising a market valued at approximately $1.2 billion. The UAE’s regulatory framework, spanning the Securities and Commodities Authority, the Dubai Financial Services Authority, and the Financial Services Regulatory Authority, sets meaningful standards for disclosure and investor suitability. Yet the sheer volume of unfiltered data reaching individual investors through apps, alert systems, and AI-driven content is outpacing the governance infrastructure designed to protect them. Earlier this year, UAE-based retail platforms reported a sharp spike in commodity trading volumes following geopolitical alerts linked to regional energy infrastructure. The pattern was instructive: investors were not responding to analysis. They were reacting to the noise itself.
In my opinion, the real competitive advantage in today’s markets has shifted decisively. It is no longer about who has access to data, because everyone does. It is about who has the discipline, the frameworks, and the human capacity to determine what that data means and what it does not. This is fundamentally a risk management challenge, not a technology challenge.
Consider the consequence chain. When platforms deliver thousands of data points, alerts, and AI-generated recommendations without adequate curation, they create an illusion of informed participation. Investors who lack the training or advisory support to contextualise this information face two symmetrical risks: paralysis, where conflicting signals prevent any decision at all, and impulsive reaction, where a single alarming headline triggers an unexamined trade. Both degrade portfolio outcomes. Both increase transaction costs, erode returns through poorly timed decisions, and expose investors to risks they have not consciously chosen to take.
This raises an uncomfortable question for data providers and platform operators. The business model of much of the fintech and financial information industry is built on engagement, meaning more alerts, more content, more interaction. But engagement is not the same as service, and information delivery without responsibility for its quality, context, and potential impact on decision-making is not a neutral act. It carries consequences, and regulators are beginning to recognise this.
The European Union’s AI Act, whose high-risk obligations for financial services take effect in August 2026, will require providers of AI-driven systems used in credit scoring, risk profiling, and investment decision-making to meet strict standards around transparency, human oversight, and auditability. The EU’s proposed Financial Data Access regulation extends similar principles to data sharing across the financial sector. These frameworks signal a clear direction: those who provide financial data and algorithmically generated analysis will increasingly bear responsibility for how that information is presented, contextualised, and governed. For the GCC, where regulators have consistently demonstrated a commitment to adopting and adapting international best practice, the trajectory is evident. Data provision is moving toward becoming a compliance-intensive activity, and firms operating in or serving the region should prepare accordingly.
But regulation alone will not solve the information paradox. Compliance frameworks establish floors, not ceilings. The deeper challenge is cultural and organisational. Investors, whether institutional or individual, need not just data but the capacity to interpret it within a coherent risk framework. Before acting on any data point, alert, or algorithmically generated recommendation, the prudent investor asks three questions: what is the source, what context is missing, and does this information warrant action or merely attention? This discipline is not intuitive in a market designed to reward speed, but it is essential. It means investing in financial literacy, in advisory relationships grounded in trust and expertise, and in governance structures that ensure decisions are informed by judgement rather than driven by impulse.
Ultimately, this is a human capital challenge. Algorithms can process data at scale, but they cannot replace the informed professional who understands context, identifies what is missing from the data, and exercises the judgement to act, or equally important to refrain from acting, when conditions are uncertain. Organisations and platforms that invest in experienced risk professionals, in robust advisory capability, and in the governance to ensure quality over quantity will build durable competitive advantages. Those that continue to prioritise data volume over decision quality will find that the market eventually prices that negligence in.
In a market flooded with information, the scarcest resource is not data. It is the judgement to know what to do with it.
Financial
Beyond the Funding Round: Building the Financial Foundations for MENA Startups to Scale
Exclusive Interview with Nasir Khan, Co-Founder, Synovo
The MENA startup ecosystem is shifting from growth at all costs to sustainable business models. What has changed, and what does it take to build a financially resilient startup from the outset?
I think the biggest change is that investors have become less willing to finance a business model indefinitely while founders work out the economics. A few years ago, a compelling growth story could carry a lot of weight. Today, people want to know what each additional customer costs, when that customer becomes profitable and how much cash the company needs to get there.
For me, resilience starts with knowing the difference between revenue, profit and cash. Having worked across telecom distribution, factoring and healthcare ventures, I’ve seen businesses look healthy on paper while working capital quietly becomes their biggest problem.
My advice is to start small enough to test your assumptions, know your margins well and build a business that can survive a slow month, not just celebrate a good one.
Raising capital is only one step towards building a successful business. What financial mistakes do startups commonly make after securing investment, and how can they avoid them?
The most common mistake is treating money in the bank as proof that the business has succeeded. Suddenly there is a bigger office, a larger team and three new markets on the roadmap, before the original model has really been proven. Fixed costs rise quickly, and reversing them is much harder.
I prefer to see founders tie each stage of spending to a milestone: demonstrating repeat purchases, shortening the sales cycle, improving gross margin or reaching a defined number of paying customers.
I’d also keep a fallback plan in case the next round takes twice as long as expected. Fundraising buys time, but what matters is what you prove during that time.
Drawing on your experience in structured finance, how should MENA founders choose between equity, debt and other financing options at different stages of growth?
I spent years in factoring and structured finance, and one lesson has stayed with me: match the type of financing to the risk you are financing.
Equity makes sense when the product, market or revenue model is still uncertain, because investors are sharing the risk of finding out whether the business works. Debt is better suited to predictable cash flows or identifiable assets. Once a business has reliable receivables, trade finance or factoring can fund working capital without giving away more ownership.
But debt is not a cure for an unprofitable business. It creates a payment obligation whether the next contract arrives or not. Founders should also watch for currency mismatches and personal guarantees. The cheapest-looking capital is not always the safest.
Access to capital varies across MENA markets. How should founders in emerging startup hubs approach financial planning differently from those in established ecosystems such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia?
First, I would resist treating MENA as a single market. Access to investors is only one difference. Collection cycles, currency exposure, regulation, customer purchasing power and the availability of experienced hires all change from country to country.
In a smaller funding ecosystem, I would plan for a longer fundraising process and keep costs as variable as possible. A local commercial partnership is often more useful early on than opening a fully staffed operation.
Even in the UAE or Saudi Arabia, access to capital does not mean every startup is fundable. Founders still have to show that they understand their own market. Expansion should follow customer evidence, not a regional map in a pitch deck.
Cash flow is critical to a startup’s survival. Which financial metrics should founders monitor, and how can they maintain cash flow discipline while pursuing growth?
I would start with five things: cash in the bank, monthly net burn, runway, gross margin and the time between invoicing a customer and actually collecting the money.
For subscription businesses, retention and customer acquisition cost matter enormously. For businesses selling to corporates or governments, receivables ageing can be just as important as revenue growth.
A simple weekly cash forecast looking 13 weeks ahead can prevent a lot of unpleasant surprises. I also like a monthly downside scenario: what happens if collections are delayed, or sales come in 25% below plan?
These are not glamorous exercises, but I’ve seen how quickly a growing business can run into trouble when sales rise faster than the cash needed to deliver them.
What makes a startup truly investor-ready today, particularly in terms of financial reporting, governance, unit economics and operational discipline?
Investor readiness is not a beautiful data room put together two weeks before a meeting. It is the discipline with which the business has been run over the previous year.
Can the founder explain the margin on a customer? Reconcile revenue to cash received? Show who owns the company, what obligations exist and which assumptions sit behind the forecast? Do they know how much of their revenue depends on a handful of customers?
In healthcare ventures such as Synovo, which I co-founded, financial planning also has to reflect clinical evidence, regulatory requirements and hospital procurement cycles. Ignore those realities and even an attractive forecast becomes meaningless.
Investors understand that early-stage businesses will not have perfect systems. What worries them is when founders cannot explain their numbers or become defensive when challenged. Being candid about risks usually strengthens investor confidence rather than weakening it.
How can MENA founders balance growth with profitability and reduce dependence on repeated funding rounds? When should they rethink their strategy if new investment fails to materialise?
Profitability does not need to arrive on day one, but the route to it should be visible. The test I use is whether growth improves the economics or simply increases the losses. If every new customer makes the funding gap bigger, scale is not solving the problem.
I would review the plan well before the runway becomes critical. If investment is uncertain, narrow the product range, protect the best customers, reduce fixed commitments and concentrate on revenue that turns into cash.
Sometimes a smaller, profitable core is the right foundation for a much larger company. Waiting until the last three months of cash to make those decisions usually leaves very few good options.
Through your involvement with the London Business School MENA Startup Competition, what distinguishes genuinely scalable startups from those with compelling pitches, and what will define the next generation of successful MENA businesses?
The competition reminded me that a polished pitch and a scalable business are two different things. The founders who caught my attention were not necessarily the ones with the grandest projections. They were the ones who could explain what customers had actually done, what they had learned from being wrong and what the next round of capital would achieve.
Our shortlisted teams were mentored by LBS alumni and volunteers, and it was encouraging to see founders willing to challenge their own assumptions rather than defend them.
I think the next generation of strong MENA businesses will combine regional ambition with local execution, sensible capital structures and the ability to earn customer trust.
Winning a competition can open doors. What founders build after the applause is what ultimately counts.
Dr. Nasir Khan is a medical doctor, entrepreneur and Sloan Fellow from London Business School. He has been building businesses since 2001 across telecom distribution, financial services, medtech and process manufacturing, and has co-founded ventures including Synovo, a UK-based digital health platform. He has also served as a judge for startup induction at the Punjab Information Technology Board’s incubation programme in Lahore and is Co-President of the LBS Entrepreneurship Club, MENA.
Financial
UAE finance has embraced AI, the returns now sit in the handoffs
With Dubai fast-tracking agentic AI and AI use among DIFC financial firms rising sharply, Samir Akel, Regional Vice President, Emerging Markets at Nintex, sets out how orchestration turns agentic AI into results for UAE banks and insurers.
This week, much of the region’s technology community has gathered in Abu Dhabi for AI Everything, and the question on the show floor has moved on. A year ago, banks and insurers asked whether to deploy AI agents; today they want to know how to make those agents deliver results across an entire customer journey.

Government is setting the pace. On 5 October, the Dubai Future Foundation launched an agentic AI accelerator covering 33 government entities and more than 300 public-facing use cases, building on the federal target to run half of government services and operations on agentic AI within two years. Few countries have put a number and a deadline on agentic AI. The UAE has done both.
Finance is keeping up. The Dubai Financial Services Authority’s survey of 661 DIFC firms found that 52% now use AI, up from 33% a year earlier, while generative AI use rose by 166%; the regulator also noted that, for many firms, adoption is still at an early stage. UAE finance has AI in many places. The value comes when those pieces work together.
Work in financial services is fragmented
Follow a corporate account opening at a typical UAE bank. The application lands in a portal or a relationship manager’s inbox; documents and identity are checked, sanctions screening runs in a separate tool, a risk team reviews the file, a committee signs it off and operations sets up the account in core banking. That’s six steps, six systems and one waiting customer.
AI agents speed up individual steps: an agent can extract a trade licence in seconds or draft a risk summary in minutes. Then the file sits in a queue for a reviewer who has no idea it is ready. The task gets faster, while the journey stays as slow as its slowest handoff.
That gap is the coordination tax, made up of the hours lost chasing approvals, re-keying data and fielding “where is my application?” calls. In banking, insurance and payments, where one journey can cross half a dozen teams, it is often the largest cost nobody actually measures.
Process is the foundation
Institutions that turn AI into outcomes start by understanding how work actually runs, and regulated firms have a head start here because they already document their processes for supervisors. The task is to map those processes as they really operate (workarounds and exceptions included) and give each step to the right worker.
Steps that must run identically every time, such as sanctions checks and payment releases, suit rules-based workflow. Reading documents and reasoning over unusual cases suit AI agents. Judgement belongs to people. With the Central Bank’s AI guidance for the sector placing clear emphasis on human oversight, deciding where people sit in a process is now part of designing it.
Orchestration makes AI operational
Once the process is clear, orchestration connects it. It coordinates people, systems, data and agents across a whole journey, deciding who or what acts next and routing exceptions to the right person before they become delays.
Think of an airport, where more aircraft add capacity only when air traffic control sequences them. AI agents work in the same way.
For a bank or insurer, orchestration brings one view of every application, claim or payment. Core banking and policy platforms keep their role while work flows between them, and each orchestrated journey becomes a template for the next, so the tenth deployment goes live faster than the first.
A 90-day starting point
Finance can borrow the government’s 90-day rhythm. Pick one journey that crosses at least three systems and two departments, such as SME lending or a motor claim, and map it as it runs today. Count the handoffs and measure the time lost between them; that figure is your coordination tax. Then assign each step to a rule, an agent or a person, orchestrate the whole journey and track time to decision. Reuse what works.
The orchestrators will lead
At the accelerator launch, Digital Dubai’s Director General said the future of digital government depends on an integrated ecosystem that brings expertise, data and capabilities together. The same holds inside every bank.
Over the next year, the number of AI agent use cases across UAE banking and government will grow rapidly. The institutions that pull ahead will be those with a platform to orchestrate and govern those agents, taking them from pilot to production at scale, while keeping people in control. In the AI era, operational advantage belongs to the orchestrators.
Financial
Henry Dannell Expands into the Middle East with Launch of DIFC Representative Office
Henry Dannell, a specialist cross-border credit adviser, has announced its expansion into the Middle East with the opening of a representative office in Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), marking a significant milestone in the firm’s international growth strategy.
The move reflects rising demand for specialist advice among internationally mobile individuals whose financial interests increasingly span multiple jurisdictions, asset classes, and lending structures. As Dubai continues to strengthen its position as a global wealth and investment hub, attracting entrepreneurs, family offices, investors, and high-net-worth individuals from around the world, the complexity of managing wealth across borders has increased significantly. Many of these individuals now live, work, invest, and hold assets internationally, creating borrowing requirements that often extend beyond conventional lending frameworks.
Henry Dannell’s expansion into Dubai is designed to bring the firm’s specialist expertise closer to the region’s growing network of wealth advisers, family offices, tax specialists, legal professionals, and internationally connected clients.
Founded in 2019, Henry Dannell has built a reputation for delivering bespoke credit and lending solutions for clients with highly sophisticated financial circumstances. The firm’s advisers support a broad spectrum of clients, from business owners and entrepreneurs to ultra-high-net-worth individuals, helping them navigate complex borrowing scenarios that frequently involve multiple jurisdictions, unconventional income structures, and international assets. Unlike traditional mortgage providers, Henry Dannell operates as a specialist advisory business focused on structuring tailored credit solutions and working alongside trusted professional advisers to address complex financing requirements.
The establishment of the DIFC representative office represents the first phase of the company’s broader regional growth ambitions and will serve as a hub for relationship-building, market engagement, and collaboration with professional advisory communities across the Middle East.
Kem Kemal, CEO and Co-Founder of Henry Dannell, said: “Over the last decade, we have seen a fundamental shift in how wealth is created, managed, and deployed. Successful individuals are increasingly global in their outlook. They may operate businesses in one country, hold investments in another, and seek opportunities across several markets simultaneously. Yet lending has not always evolved at the same pace.”
He explained that too often, highly accomplished individuals with substantial assets and strong financial positions encounter challenges because their circumstances fall outside conventional frameworks. “Our role is to understand the complete picture and design bespoke solutions that reflect the realities of modern international wealth.”
“Dubai has become one of the most important centers for global capital, entrepreneurship and wealth advisory services,” he added. “Establishing a presence within DIFC allows us to be closer to the professional advisers and internationally connected clients we serve, while strengthening relationships across a region that continues to play an increasingly influential role in global finance.”
With over 165 years of combined industry experience across its advisory team, Henry Dannell has developed specialist expertise across residential, commercial, and specialist lending transactions. Through its Dubai presence, Henry Dannell aims to deepen engagement with the region’s professional advisory ecosystem while contributing to discussions around international wealth, investment, and cross-border financial planning.
-
Trending1 year agoOPPO A6 Pro 5G Review: Reliable Daily Driver
-
Tech News2 years agoDenodo Bolsters Executive Team by Hiring Christophe Culine as its Chief Revenue Officer
-
VAR2 years agoMicrosoft Launches New Surface Copilot+ PCs for Business
-
Automotive2 years agoAGMC Launches the RIDDARA RD6 High Performance Fully Electric 4×4 Pickup
-
Tech Interviews3 years ago
Navigating the Cybersecurity Landscape in Hybrid Work Environments
-
Hospitality2 years agoGulfood 2025 30th Edition Kicks Off Today, Setting New Benchmarks in F&B Growth and Innovation
-
VAR11 months agoHuawei Nova 14 Pro Review: Where Camera Excellence Meets Ecosystem Evolution
-
Tech News1 year agoNothing Launches flagship Nothing Phone (3) and Headphone (1) in theme with the Iconic Museum of the Future in Dubai


